How to Start Your Online Business or Grow an Existing One

Hundreds of step-by-step video tutorials and tools show you how to find profitable markets, get product ideas, source the best products to sell, build profitable websites easily, and drive qualified traffic. Plus, discover how to outsource it all.

Access Thousands of Instant Products You Can Sell

Everything you need to start or grow your own highly profitable web business — regardless of size or model.

  • Ideal for any skill level or business
  • Follow lessons at your own pace
  • No boring manuals or downloads
  • Apply what you learn in minutes
  • Learn anywhere, anytime, 24/7
  • Try it risk-free for a full 30 days

Want More? Click Here For Details »


Tweet Fearlessly, Block Ruthlessly

Tweet Fearlessly, Block Ruthlessly

istock 000001065834xsmall 150x150 Tweet Fearlessly, Block RuthlesslyYes­ter­day, I had a tweet burp.

(If you’ve been liv­ing under a rock in the past year, a “tweet” is a brief, text mes­sage on micro-​​blogging plat­form Twit­ter.)

I call it a “tweet burp” because it’s some­thing like a brain fart. But I pre­fer “brain burp.” Rea­son is, unlike a brain fart where one for­gets some­thing basic or says some­thing mean­ing­less, what I thought, and sub­se­quently tweeted about, was sur­pris­ingly meaningful.

And for some, even profound.

They are tips on how to Twit­ter bet­ter. (Try to say that 10 times in a row really fast!) Let me share it with you by post­ing some of the high­lights here.

Some of these tips are not extra­or­di­nary, of course. Most of them are sim­ply com­mon sense. But they are some of the things I do in my own social media involve­ment that has proven to work well for me. I rec­om­mend you do the same…

It all started when Amrit Hal­lan asked on Twit­ter: “Won­der­ing what key­words should a con­tent writer or online copy­writer must tar­get. Any ideas?” We began tweet­ing back-​​and-​​forth in an effort to help him about his key­word selec­tion for his niche.

He told me that his key­words are pulling in very lit­tle traf­fic. A con­ver­sa­tion and a series of tips ensued, where, in short, I told him to tar­get bet­ter key­words — because the ones he chose may not be on his tar­get market’s radar.

The prob­lem, I gath­ered, is that he was bet­ting on words revolv­ing around his services.

My think­ing is, peo­ple don’t look for solu­tions by typ­ing them into search engines. They are likely look­ing for solu­tions by typ­ing in the prob­lem, or symp­tom, instead.

To prove my the­ory in Amrit’s case, I used a cou­ple of key­word tools. And sure enough, search vol­ume for terms related to the prob­lem peo­ple expe­ri­enced was much larger than those with key­words that included the solution.

True, traf­fic lev­els may still not be extrav­a­gant. But the chances are high they will bring in more traf­fic because seek­ers will have an affin­ity with the more tar­geted search results, as well as bring in more tar­geted traf­fic to boot.

This reminded me of some­thing bril­liant my friend and top copy­writer David Garfinkel once said. He said to write copy (or in this case, to write keyword-​​rich con­tent), you need to know three crit­i­cal things:

  1. Who is my client,
  2. What is their prob­lem, and
  3. How are they talk­ing about it?

Know­ing the first one is cru­cial. A lot of peo­ple do mar­ket research only to gauge demand, with­out ever know­ing who their client really is, much less how they per­ceive, talk about, and seek out solu­tions for, their problem.

The third ques­tion in par­tic­u­lar is the kicker!

Peo­ple look­ing for your ser­vices may be typ­ing some­thing com­pletely dif­fer­ent in the search engines, and if you ignore this you’re going to miss out on a ton of traffic.

Back to my point. The keen thing about this inter­ac­tion was, a cou­ple of other peo­ple got involved in the con­ver­sa­tion. It was awe­some. It also gave me a chance to help oth­ers who were on the side­lines, lurk­ing and learn­ing what was being said.

I know, because a lot of peo­ple either replied or direct-​​messaged me to thank me. Plus, at the end it gave me an oppor­tu­nity to talk about our own key­word research course, which resulted in a few sales let alone a few extra followers.

And that was when I had a brain burp.

What hap­pened was a pow­er­ful exam­ple of how to effec­tively mar­ket on Twit­ter, even with­out mar­ket­ing directly on it at all. Plus, the con­ver­sa­tion indi­rectly lead to a few epipha­nies. So I decided to tweet some tips in light of what had just occurred.

How­ever, before I tell them to you, let me share some­thing else that hap­pened. Some­thing, well, not as pos­i­tive. (There is a method to my mad­ness, so bear with me.)

Dur­ing the con­ver­sa­tion, some­one replied to me, com­plain­ing that I was “clog­ging up their tweet­sream” and told me, in essence, to shut up.

I found that dis­turb­ing and fas­ci­nat­ing at the same time.

The rea­son is, if a per­son feels I’m clog­ging up their tweet stream, then why are they fol­low­ing me? What­ever his pur­pose in fol­low­ing me was, it cer­tainly wasn’t because he found what I tweeted was of any value. In other words, he wasn’t “qualified.”

So I decided to block him.

And block­ing is such an unused fea­ture on Twit­ter, but it’s one I highly rec­om­mend. It’s really easy. Go to a person’s pro­file, and on the right there’s a link that says “block” under­neath their bio. By block­ing some­one, they can’t fol­low you or see your tweets.

Block­ing is not just for whin­ers and stalk­ers, either. Use it to block spam­mers, spam­bots, and peo­ple who use scripts — scripts are not real peo­ple but soft­ware that seek out fol­low­ers for the pur­pose of build­ing their own list.

(Alice Seba wrote an inter­est­ing arti­cle on the sub­ject, by the way, in which she com­pared “fol­low­bots” to those infa­mous spam­mers’ safe­lists. And I agree.)

Now, don’t worry. I don’t block aut­o­fol­low­ers out­right — peo­ple who auto­mat­i­cally fol­low those who fol­low them. But I do try to block those that aut­o­fol­low then auto-​​unfollow when the script real­izes you don’t fol­low back. These are mostly spam­bots, not real people.

Nev­er­the­less, here’s the series of tips I gleaned from these exchanges.

Want to spread your social authority?

Search Twit­ter for ques­tions peo­ple in your niche are ask­ing, and respond using a reply. Even try to engage them in a con­ver­sa­tion. You don’t need to fol­low them. Just be help­ful. Use the “@reply” to intro­duce your­self and answer their question.

Be care­ful, how­ever. I don’t mean to say you should do this as a way to get clients or sales, much less fol­low­ers. Your goal is not to seek out peo­ple you can eas­ily spam to.

It’s about increas­ing your vis­i­bil­ity about you and your exper­tise, which will inevitably increase your Twit­ter fol­low­ers. Gen­uine fol­low­ers. Real peo­ple with real prob­lems or con­cerns, who lis­ten and care, and value what you say.

This will sub­se­quently increase your leads and your sales, too.

That’s what being social is all about. But being social doesn’t mean just being among oth­ers, it also means doing among oth­ers. That is, engag­ing, con­vers­ing, inter­act­ing. Answer­ing ques­tions, offer­ing advice, tweet­ing brief tips, etc.

It’s amaz­ing how many peo­ple ask ques­tions on Twitter.

Do a Twit­ter search for the kinds of ques­tions peo­ple ask, or using key­words in your niche peo­ple typ­i­cally use when they have a need or a prob­lem, and you’ll be amazed by the results. Twit­ter is filled with poten­tial prospects. Peo­ple you can serve, not sell to.

Also, don’t for­get peo­ple use Twit­ter search, too. If they have a ques­tion, a chal­lenge, or an idea, they some­times search for answers on Twit­ter as well. Not just the search engines. So you want to be in front of them, too.

In fact, peo­ple are con­stantly look­ing for wor­thy peo­ple to fol­low. One great way is to look at peo­ple you are fol­low­ing, and see who they are fol­low­ing. It’s a great start. Check out their pro­files. Check out their tweetstreams.

And many of them are also look­ing for wor­thy peo­ple to fol­low by con­duct­ing searches on Twit­ter. They tend to search for key­words in their niche. (For exam­ple, I often con­duct searches using the terms “copy­writ­ing,” “mar­ket­ing,” and “blogging.”)

So ensure to include those key­words in your tweets.

In fact, here’s a great tip:

Just like the eas­i­est SEO strat­egy is to pub­lish a lot of fresh con­tent, because by doing so you nat­u­rally increase the num­ber of indexed pages on the search engines as well as the num­ber of key­words and key­word com­bi­na­tions, the eas­i­est “TEO” (or “Twit­ter Engine Opti­miza­tion”) is tweet­ing a lot of keyword-​​rich tweets.

How­ever, in your TEO efforts, don’t for­get spam­bots. There are just as many spam­mers con­duct­ing searches — often, for nefar­i­ous rea­sons — as there are legit­i­mate people.

So don’t be afraid to block, block, block!

Nev­er­the­less, every­thing you tweet is both per­ma­nent and search­able. So by post­ing a lot of keyword-​​rich tweets will cause you and your mes­sages to come up a lot in the Twit­ter search engine results. But what you want to show up are follow-​​worthy tweets.

Specif­i­cally, don’t just tweet for the sake of pum­mel­ing the data­base with your updates. Be help­ful, not spammy. Above all, be nice. Remem­ber, and it’s worth repeat­ing: every­thing you tweet is both per­ma­nent and search­able. Every­thing.

If you want to be more strate­gic about it, look for peo­ple with large, authen­tic fol­low­ings in your niche whose opin­ions their fol­low­ers value. And try to inter­act with them.

They will con­verse with you. Their peo­ple will fol­low you not because your name is men­tioned on the con­ver­sa­tions, but because your opin­ions mat­ter to them, too.

After all, you are like them.

And peo­ple like peo­ple who are like them.

It’s all about affin­ity.

If a gen­uine rela­tion­ship devel­ops as a result, believe me, they will talk about you. They will men­tion you as a per­son wor­thy of being fol­lowed on those famous “fol­low Fri­day” tweets. They will link to your blog. They will retweet your tweets. They will endorse you.

So be sin­cere. Be help­ful. And be generous.

Don’t just look for peo­ple with large fol­low­ings, either. Inter­act­ing with peo­ple with a large num­ber of fol­low­ers only because they are pop­u­lar, with the hope you will access their “list,” won’t score you any brownie points.

Look for peo­ple with whom you have an affin­ity and whose opin­ions their fol­low­ers value.

Often known as “thought lead­ers,” they have large fol­low­ings for a rea­son. Unless they’re a celebrity with a huge fan­base, these thought lead­ers often tend to tweet valu­able infor­ma­tion, help­ful advice, and inter­est­ing tweets. So why not do the same?

So don’t just fol­low oth­ers. Be a leader and build your own following.

Edu­cate. Encour­age. Engage.

Your authen­tic­ity will shine through. Equally, any insin­cer­ity will shine through just as well. The worst thing that can hap­pen is, if you’re only look­ing for fol­low­ers, they will see through it and speak out against you — or sim­ply ignore you altogether.

My point is, don’t go trawl­ing for followers.

Look for peo­ple you can serve.

Look at it this way: in mar­ket­ing, they say you want to be in front of qual­i­fied eye­balls. But just try­ing to be in front of qual­i­fied peo­ple doesn’t mean you deserve their atten­tion and respect, much less their fol­low. Qual­ity is some­thing you attract, not extract.

So post qual­ity tweets, espe­cially keyword-​​rich tweets — i.e., be help­ful, gen­uine, and real. And you will attract qual­ity fol­low­ers, almost as a nat­ural byproduct.

And don’t be afraid to praise peo­ple on Twit­ter. Gen­uinely and gen­er­ously. Peo­ple want to know you care. And peo­ple want to know what and who you care about, too.

They say “praise pub­licly, but crit­i­cize pri­vately.” Right? Sim­i­larly, praise oth­ers on Twit­ter. Praise often. But if you have a beef with some­one, don’t do what the com­plainer did ear­lier, when he told me to shut up. Send them a direct mes­sage instead.

Above all, don’t be afraid to…

… Tweet fear­lessly and block ruthlessly.

About the Author

Last 5 Posts By Michel Fortin

Other Related Posts


Share
Category: Articles
This post was written on Friday, May 29th, 2009. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

New! Paul Hancox combines direct selling and copywriting techniques to produce online conversion rates as high as 10%. His 127-page report shows you how. Click for more »

  • Right on, Michel. You rock, and I enjoy your tweets, advice, tips, and down-to-earth attitude about marketing. I am learning alot about Twitter from you and your recommendations, i.e. Alice Seba, the sweetie. Thanks so much.
  • Great post Michel, I agree entirely about blocking spammy followers, I guess one of the reasons Twitter users don't use it a lot is the slightly draconian "are you sure?" message Twitter throws out when you do a block. It put me off at first, now I shoot 'em on sight.
  • Michel Fortin on tweeting, blocking and initiating dialogue on Twitter.
  • Loved it! It actually shone a spotlight on areas where I can add more value in Twitter. And thankfully, no one has ever told me I tweeted too much :-) How totally rude of them, but it was a good lesson.
  • I am thinking about running an "Ask Andy" session every Thursday, but I will run it somehow as a liveblogging session from my blog as well with a few tools I have found.

    I could also combine it with livestreaming, but bandwidth from here isn't perfect.

    Why Thursday? Not to be totally materialistic about it, but people remember it on Follow Fridays, and quite often give special thanks because you were helpful - not the usual lists, but special mentions
  • @Andy Beard - Great tip, Andy! In fact, to underline what you just said, many of today's (Friday) follow fridays that included were as a result of my "tweet burp" yesterday.

    Hmmm. I think I'm going to do something similar. Good catch!
  • Kendra
    Awesome entry!
  • Michel,

    Great stuff...I protect my updates on Twitter so I approve all followers. While this may prevent my tweets from making it to the twitter search results...I'm also doing my best to ensure that "real" people and content follow me.

    It's not a perfect system, but it works...and I do "block ruthlessly" :)

    Joseph Ratliff
  • Amen, Michel! As always, perfectly well put!

    I'm so over all the insincerity I see flying across my Twitter stream (or would that be sailing across? ;-) ). All these ridiculous spammy "systems" and apps people are selling that promise to bring a windfall of "targeted" followers (targeted for being sheep who just want to be "herd," but who don't care to listen)... And this silly game of following people simply for the reciprocity that may or may not come (after which, they'll unfollow if they don't receive). Whoa - and need I mention the incredibly disingenuous "Follow Friday" fiends who simply list half of their own followers, yet never say WHY those people are actually worth following. Blah. Yuck. Enough.

    (Okay. Rant over. Deep breath. Tell Sylvie hi. And that she rocks.)

    My most rewarding moments on Twitter have been when I was fortunate enough to fall into one of those deeply insightful and interactive "conversations" like what you described having yesterday with your "tweet burp" (hilarious, btw). Unfortunately, I didn't quit "auto-following" early enough in this game, and I now get so turned off by all the narcissistic and self -serving tweets every time I log on that I tend to give up before I ever feel like engaging. It was more manageable when I was only following about 1,500 people I actually knew offline, had things in common with, or had connected with previously on other social networks (believe it or not, many of those MySpace "relationships" did hold merit and carried over).

    In the end, you said it best: "So be sincere. Be helpful. And be generous." That will take you much farther on Twitter and get you followers who actually give a hoot. (What's up with the bird lingo?) And vice versa.

    An even better piece of advice was, " So don’t be afraid to block, block, block!" I've been saying "see ya!" to a lot more people recently. Spring cleaning is a good thing.

    Thank you, Michel, for continuing to be one of the most authentic and sincere voices in this field.

    ~Julie

    P.S. Great advice on how to come up with keywords. My YouTube students have the same problem. I think I'll share your thoughts with them about asking how your target market is TALKING ABOUT their problem. You're right -- that is totally the kicker.

    Too, I love the concept of "Twitter Engine Optimization" ("TEO"). I think that might be a newly coined term, no? A Fortinism, perhaps? ;-P
  • Great post Michel! Your honest and common sense approach is truly refreshing. I've never used the block feature until now that is ;) Thank you for the excellent post!
  • Michel,
    Great article. It has given me a lot to think about on how I am using twitter. I have rarely blocked anyone but spammers. The suggestions about how to find fellow tweeters are excellent.
    Thanks
  • "Who is my client,
    What is their problem, and
    How are they talking about it? "

    And I would add "what solution are they looking for".

    Folks operate from WIFM not "what is is it for you", and that is too often missed out right.

    Michel, great example of how to use Twitter. Probably represents 1% of the usage (and I may be optimistic).

    I recently did a keyword research project. The web site was about their solutions, not about what their target customers were searching for. At first they were skeptical, but I showed them which keywords had the higher CPC and that changed their mind. (CPC is not always the best indicator, but it is something folks can relate to).

    John Deck

    PS. Can't believe someone complained about clogging up their twitter stream. That is comical.
  • I usually un-follow immediatelt people that my auto-follow service did accept initially, if they have the message option de-activated.

    I believe they are not really socializing, but instead, only look for more followers to listen to their messages.

    But what's the point of all that if I cannot even reply to them?

    Twitter is all about sharing. That work always both ways. If the stream is "valved" one way only, I don't want to be there, period.
  • Thanks Michel! “Be a leader and build your own following. Educate. Encourage. Engage.” Yes, some are common sense, but most of it I never thought of myself. Awesome!
  • Thanks for the great article. Have never blocked anyone. You've made me rethink this whole follow back thing. Guess I'm going to have to start to Block Ruthlessly.
  • I don´t have idea before about the diferents way who can i use this... now i have to use all the tools than i have in this wonderful internet, thks for the information
  • No one has ever told me I tweeted too much :-) How totally rude of them, but it was a good lesson.
  • Just don't forget that many people with large following are using scripts to boost large quantities of useless followers. I was swamped a few days ago by real estate agents from the US, clearly my address was being passed on from one to another somehow.

    The other thing about Twitter is that people often provide info, tips and links. It's silly to think of it as a purely sales channel. If you do, you're probably missing about 50% of the benefits. One of the sites I run has an account @cannesorbust. A fair amount of the info I post comes from other Tweeters or from scanning keywords. In other words, it directly feeds the site itself.
  • Michel,

    Great post. I recently you in my Google Reader so that I can remember to read your blogs easily.

    Keep up y our great work!

    John Ho
  • Hi, Michel,

    I beg to disagree. Not with your intelligent arguments on how to be found on Twitter. This is all true. And explained in great detail right where it should be explained. On your blog.

    I am the person you blocked. Not a follower who followes to gain followers, but a copywriter interested in the ideas of other copywriters.

    By posting about 20 Tweets in quick succession about the same subject to the same person (Amrit Hallan), you were actually publishing a personal conversation that counteracts the essence of Twitter (in my personal opinion).

    The idea of Twitter is to use 140 characters to share a quick thought, an event or idea. NOT to publish a lecture hacked in 20-odd 140-character size bits. Indeed, when I opened Twitter, my whole page was filled with Michel Fontin Tweets. I felt like you invaded my private space. Like someone climbing on a table in my favourite bar and yelling out a long speech, drowning out all other conversation.

    So I rudely (?) asked you to tone it down. Maybe I should have been more diplomatic. But at that moment I was a little miffed. And isn't it nice if someone tells you what he thinks in stead of suffering in silence and badmouthing you behind your back?

    I'm sorry if you felt hurt by my critical words. I'm sorry that this compelled you to block me. But it is your right to choose to accept only followers that praise you.

    I'll leave it like this and will come and read your blog every once in a while.
  • @Krek. -

    Hi Krek,

    I don't know Michel well nor do I know you.

    Just want to make a generic comment without any bias (or with just a tint of bias.)

    Research shows apparently there's 50% chance of having emails misunderstood, against the intention of the writer. It means electronic communication is not easy to be spot on. Human communications, in general, is more complicated and complex than most of us are aware of. If possible, it's always better to talk face to face for important issues to minimize misunderstanding. But in in the www world, this is not viable virtually all the time. But within the same company or corporate, most likely it's possible.

    John Ho
  • Great post: really useful for those who, like me, have a small business and are not experts in marketing! Thank you!
    Gloria C.
    (Tuscany, Italy)
  • @Krek. - Sir, I didn't block because you criticize me (instead of praise me, as you seem to imply is all I'm interested in), but because you were RUDE.

    You have the right to follow those who tweet the way you like. After all, that is what FOLLOWING is. But you don't have the right to dictate those you do follow how they should tweet to accommodate you.

    A better analogy is, when you follow me you come to my cocktail party where I'm having a conversation, and you shout "Please quiet down or take it outside! I'm trying to have a drink in peace!"

    I see you're from the Netherlands. Would it be right for me to choose to follow you, and the tweet publicly, "Please tweet in English! Stop clogging up my tweetstream with tweets I don't understand."

    If you don't like what I tweet, you unfollow. Simple as that. But since this is the second time you've done this (you did this to me before), so I decided to block you.
  • Michel, while I ultimately agree with your position and advice, I can see @Krek.'s point as well and I think it boils down to another critical marketing tenet:

    Positioning.

    To give a real example, when I first started out on Twitter one of the first people I followed was @Guykawasaki. I love his books and blog on business and entrepreneurship. In my mind, @Guykawasaki owned the position for fresh, interesting, street-wise, and quickly digestible entrepreneurship advice.

    So naturally when I followed him on Twitter I expected more of the same. Big assumption! And one that was ultimately incorrect.

    Instead my tweet stream ended up filled with tweet after tweet pushing articles from Guy's new site/service/rss aggregator that seems to be about everything under the sun.... (the name escapes me).

    So what did I do? Ultimately I just unfollowed him. I would never have thought to go to him and tell him to STOP, cause hey, it's his Twitter account and he can do what he wants with it.

    But it would have been really nice if his tweets were congruent with his personal brand. Michel in my opinion (in this case in particular) your keyword/copywriting tweets are congruent, but it seems @Krek. would disagree.
  • @John Somerton - Exactly, John. You would vote with your follow. And that's the point -- not whether or not Krek was right. This is somewhat tangential, albeit somewhat related. But the point I was making remains, if Guy turns out to be a different tweeter than you expected, you UNFOLLOW. You can tweet your displeasure. You can politely ask Guy to change. But you wouldn't rudely dictate how he should tweet, let alone impose your etiquette.

    I was having a conversation. A conversation many people who followed me enjoyed and thanked me for. Similarly, if Krek wanted to criticize me or suggest his point of view, I would have been more than open and willing to hear him out. He should have, just as equally, entered into a conversation with me. Not complained or commanded me.

    If he had an issue with my Twitted etiquette, why did he ignore etiquette himself?
  • John Acland
    @Michel Fortin - well said Michel & John, bye Krek!
  • @Michel Fortin - "Vote with your follow" perfectly sums it up! It is a question of etiquette, but unfortunately that is such a subjective concept that is completely out of our own sphere of control...

    It's kind of like, we've all gone through the McDonald's drive through, and know what to expect. And as a result we expect that consistently.

    If McDonald's suddenly decided that, for one day or one hour only, you had to go through for every item you ordered (instead of every order) - so in other words once for your burger, once for your fries, and again around for your coke.

    Some people will still be as loyal to McDonald's as ever, others will be somewhat offput by the change but keep coming back, others will vote with their feet and decide never to come back (after all they don't know that this change in behaviour is for "one-day only"), while still others would park their car, walk on in, and stomp their feet and yell at the manager! How do you correct that etiquette?

    Just goes to show we can't be all things to all people, and if you're not for @Krek then he should just unfollow. I guess I just wanted to point out that our own personal or professional brand and positioning is within our control - so tweet with purpose, whatever that may be!
  • Does it really matter who auto-follows and auto-unfollows? I see no need to block; I just ignore them. If someone clogs my tweetstream more than they bring value, I just unfollow.
  • You're right, Michel, I was rude and I apologise. I could have just unfollowed you, but I enjoy most of your tweets so I didn't want to unfollow.

    Maybe it is something to think about nonetheless. Think about your followers when you decide to explain something in great detail to one person, forcing everyone else to listen in and more or less monopolising the conversation on al lot of followers pages. You placed 27 tweets in about 30 minutes. All @AmritHallan, so clearly meant for him.

    You may think : "It's my party and I'll tweet as I seem fit." But unlike a normal party, everybody can hear anything you say, even if it is to one person. Is it polite towards your other guests?

    I could have said nothing and just gone away. I did say something, too rudely I admit. You decided to block me, but you might also treated my 'complaint' as a chance to learn something about the nature of Twitter and follower/followee interaction.

    By the way, you say "You did this to me before"... I've searched, but I can not find the earlier intstance I was rude to you. You probably mistake me for someone else.
  • @John Somerton - John, therein lies the difference. McDonald's suddenly changing for a brief period of time is indeed unexpected. But I have a history of conversing with my followers. So it wasn't unexpected. Even for new followers, my tweet history is there for all to see. Plus, my conversations are appreciated by a lot of my followers because they learn so much.

    If McDonald's started to itemize their orders, it may annoy the person giving the order, but not all of that particular store's patrons, at the same time. The only people it could annoy are those waiting in line at the drive-thru. But even then, their order would be impeded because of other people's orders taking longer. On Twitter, however, my conversing with someone else doesn't impede others to converse with me or use Twitter.

    As far as someone who comes into the restaurant and yells at the manager, McDonald's does have a choice. They can refuse to serve that customer (akin to blocking), or at the very least have the right to NOT take that kind of rudeness. Nobody deserves to be treated like that, and everyone deserves respect. Although it wan't the case or the intent with Krek, situations like these (disruptive customer stomping and yelling) is, in my book, abusive.
  • @John Somerton - By the way, one thing I do agree with Krek is inane, meaningless conversations. I despise people who tweet short spurts that have no content, point, or purpose. I'm talking about those like, "Hey," "Cool," "Thanks," "Waassup?" "True," "I don't know," "You're kidding me?" etc.

    But in this case, my point remains: I would unfollow. Simple as that.
  • @Michel On the other hand, if nobody ever complains (preferably without yelling but hey, I apologised), MacDonalds will keep believing they have made the right decision up until they see the sales drop drastically. A loyal customer is honest and helps the company avoid making mistakes.

    Like a good friend pointing out your halitosis in stead of letting you become a social outcast.
  • @Krek. - right. But a true friend wouldn't say, "Stop stinking up my air! Go breathe somewhere else." Especially if that friend followed the other around.

    Nevertheless, I think we're going too much on a tangent and missing the point of this blog post.

    I appreciate the apology. Thank you.
  • @Michel Fortin - Fair enough - the mechanics of a drive-through and Twitter are drastically different, however it was more the setting of expectations I was referring to.

    Some people may choose to follow you on Twitter because of your blog, in which case the expectations are a little different than if they were to examine your tweet history. No fault of your own really, just interesting dynamics.

    It would be nice to see a service (maybe already exists) that allows you to Tweet under multiple "personas" or tag tweets based on topic to help followers filter.... does that exist?

    Just to be clear I agree with you - there is no room for abuse and disrespect - anywhere for that matter.
  • The best thing about Twitter, IMHO, is Twitter Search.

    I mean, really, how often do you go through the tweets in real time? I hardly ever do that any more. The real time posts are see are quite accidental.

    I know this comment has little to do with your post, Michel, but I just HAD to say it.

    Look out. Here comes Google Wave! ;P
  • this is amusing...the problem i think is deeper than the etiquette issue you keep drilling into Michael. The problem as i see it is so many people TAKE THEMSELVES SO DAMN SERIOUSLY!

    hello, it's twitter...it's a wonderful albeit imperfect and often irritating medium.

    i did appreciate the fact that krek adds some more fuel to the fire with his post, and i hope he comes back and keeps it going. If anything, because it adds a little more human amusement to the otherwise often dull charade of power plays and rehashed sales techniques on the intertubes...

    cheers.

    i leave you with an amusing quote from the misanthrope of another era, Oscar Wilde:

    "Democracy is simply the bludgeoning of the people
    for the people
    by the people"
  • I'm Not one to shy away from controversy or debate myself, I have to share my disagreement with Michel Fortin here....
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqC5wxsdNJ0
    thanks and take care
    Bryan Bliss
  • I also want to add that i LOVE the power of the block which
    has an even MORE powerful effect on spammers.
    it turns out, if someones profile gets blocked often enough,
    it sends up a red flag for twitter to consider banning the profile for
    "unusual activity" so
    I personally block all those fakes and spammers that set up accounts,
    especially if they are a decoy or fraud accounts that
    use some famous celebrity or well known and respected persons image or name in attempt to defraud and get followers fast
    ( like the fake Eben-pagan1234, or ashtonkutcher2x34)
    I say block ruthlessly, openly and
    even alert others to block known frauds or spammers.

    community, respect, authenticity and generosity are the
    best of what twitter brings out,
    we should all keep our standards high
    and our patience low for those that selfishly violate those standards.

    thanks and take care
    bry
  • I agree that objecting to someone's tweets is a little like agreeing to be on a reality show and then complaining about an invasion of privacy.

    The thing I find truly annoying is the auto follow/ reply function used by people building followers with a message that goes something like : "Please tell me all about yourself - I really want to get to know you!" (now picture it being spoken in robot voice : ) - that's an instant unfollow/block for me.
  • Michel - What a well thought-out and intriguing post. Twitter is a time vampire (IMHO) but it also can be used for inspiring, enhancing, helping and sharing value with others as you mentioned. Thank you for putting things into your valued perspective so all of your readers can benefit from your wisdom and put the concepts to work.

    You & Sylvie have a wonderful week!
    Donna
  • (I know I'm a little late to this...)

    Michel, I love you man, but I disagree on the follow/unfollow thing. I know I'm in the minority and may lose my "Nice Guy" standing, but I think building a Twitter following is much more like building an email list than you suggest.

    With an email list don't you sometimes "prune" it to remove the deadwood (so to speak)? What's the difference between that and unfollowing someone on Twitter who hasn't followed you? In each case you're solidifying your list down to the most targeted/interested people.

    I do agreed with almost everything you said in your article, but you seem to equate scripts with spam, and I think that's a misplaced criticism. You could say a squeeze page is a script -- but that doesn't mean people who use squeeze pages to build their lists will spam.

    There are slow ways to get your name/profile in front of people on Twitter and there are fast ways. A script is a fast way, but in both cases you MUST build a relationship with your followers if you ever intend to monetize it in any way.

    Just the same way you have to build relationships with people on your email lists.

    I believe you can be a good Twitizen and still use a script to increase the number of people who follow you. Script does NOT have to equal spam.

    Thanks.

    Jay Jennings
  • @Jay Jennings - Jay, I disagree with your position and your analogy specifically, because you don't reciprocally join each other's list. (I'll come back to this.)

    Rather than an optin list, scripts like these remind me more of spam safelists, which is a better analogy, in my estimation. Or FFA linkfarms, where the only person it helps is the owner of the list -- not the people posting their links, much less look and click on them.

    You said, "you seem to equate scripts with spam." No I don't. I equate scripts that autofollow/get followed/autounfollow with spam. Even Twitter themselves officially said that autofollow is disingenuous.

    To me, follow/get followed/unfollow is not like legit email optin (which you seem to confuse it with) but more like spam. You scrape emails from the web, put them all into a huge list, and have a script that sends out millions of emails, with the hope that enough (a very small percentage) get through, get read, and get acted upon.

    And then you dump the rest. It's no different than scripts that check to see if the emails in a database are legit before sending them out. I stand firm on my position.

    And, if you're a spammer, you're going to sell this list and call it a "safe list."

    The easiest way to look at it is this:

    If you need a script to build a following, it shows that you're not able to attract a genuine following based on the merit of your content, the expertise you project, and the value of your tweets. Quality followers are people you attract, not extract with the help of some script.

    Stated simply, trawling for followers makes you look like you can't get any real followers to follow you. Think about it.

    Since you compared it to optin list scripts, think about it this way...

    A script doesn't add subscribers to your list by fishing and scouring the Internet -- that's no different than a harvestbot scraping email addresses off of websites. No. It adds people to your list (just as Twitter proper does) when they ask to be subscribed to your list.

    See the difference?

    Bottom line, I do believe people like yourself have good intentions with this process. It's not you I'm against. It's the spammers who abuse these scripts and perpetrate myths (such as not returning a follow is discourteous, which is BS!).

    I can say a heckuvalot more on this subject, but to refrain from repeating myself, I encourage you to read my other two articles on the subject, which explains in detail my position. The link is the first, and at the end there's a link to the second one...

    http://www.michelfortin.com/twitter-populated-d...

    By the way, I love you too, Jay! Give me your Twitter username because I do want to follow you. I know you and I do consider you a friend. I also like people who debate based on substance, rather than emotion and spurious logic.
  • Wow, Michel, what a lot of good stuff you have given us to think about. Twitter has been so much fun for me precisely because I love to engage, interact and hear different viewpoints. But I realize it is not always the best medium for that, at least for me.

    For instance, if I get into an interesting conversation with someone I follow but who is not following me, I can't send them a direct message and so end up being guilty of "clogging up" someone's Twitter stream (at least in their eyes.)

    I never really thought of using "block" instead of "unfollow." I chose to unfollow one person who was all political rants, which I found quite divisive. My mistake (who would have thought) was to send him a private message before I unfollowed, explaining (in what I thought was a kind, thoughtful way) why I was unfollowing him. Thought it might be useful information for him. (I know I would want to know.)

    Next morning I woke up to a public @ message for all to see. It was a one-word obscenity (The "a" word) with four exclamation points. I was speechless, really just amazed that someone would behave that way. And now when I search my Twitter name, that one-word message comes up, completely out of context, of course. Think I'll just use "block" from here on out.

    Thanks for all the suggestions here. As a blogger, I can appreciate the thought you put into this post.
  • Sorry to hear this happened to you. But if it were me, I wouldn't mind. When people use childish bullyragging tactics, I let the court of public opinion do the work and let them look like fools all their own. And those who believe them or side with them, well, they are not people you want anyway. Right?

    So yes, blocking is a powerful tool and people don't use it enough. When I say I block ruthlessly, I do. People tend not to, because they want everyone to be their friend. Well, that's no different than someone who wants all the email spam they can get because they're afraid of losing out on something important... or to get a lot of email to feel "important."
  • TheEntrepreneurDiva
    Great Post! You are awesome! "be helpful, genuine, and real" is the best advice you can give anyone that uses Twitter. Thanks.
  • Juslyn
    Very informative stuff.

    Always love hearing your thoughts on Twitter, Michel. The more we hear, the more sense its making to us as relative newbies. We really appreaciate the value you give to ourselves the Twitter community.

    Cheers,

    Lynn & Justin.
  • You're very welcome! Glad it was helpful to you.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

New! Paul Hancox combines direct selling and copywriting techniques to produce online conversion rates as high as 10%. His 127-page report shows you how. Click for more »