RSS Feed email updates Email Updates

Short Copy Outperforms? Heresy!

bread.jpgAn interesting discussion is going on in one of my favorite online forums, The Warriors Forum, about short copy winning over long copy. And the author of the thread cited a study he conducted, where he proved that shorter copy won over long copy.

Some people are screaming “heresy!” Others agreed.

Personally, I believe the study conducted is indeed valid because it makes sense. In this particular case, short copy was warranted for this particular market with this particular offer.

But is this true in all cases? When you look at his study closer, you realize that it lacks information about the variables involved, which makes the study, and its findings, a bit misleading.

Here’s what I mean.


I truly believe that long copy sells better than short copy. But I base my opinion on the average, not the universal. Because, in some cases, shorter copy does sell better. But there are very specific reasons for this, and I want to go over a few of the important ones that I see all the time.

However, before I give you some of those reasons (and there are many, which I cannot go through in the scope of this one article), I’d like to make a distinction, if I could, so you understand the factors that come into play.

When people often look at short copy, even test it and then realize that it works better than long copy, there are many variables that one fails to look at. The price, the industry and particularly the target market play a significant role.

But there are also two others that I’d like to go over today: a) the product category or type, and b) the pre-selling process (i.e., the mindset of the market).

First, the product type.

When I used to teach marketing principles in college (part of the Business Administration curriculum at Algonquin College in Ottawa, Canada), my students learned that there are four textbook categories of products:

  1. Convenience products
  2. Shopping products
  3. Specialty products
  4. Unsought products

Each product category has a different sales process and marketing requirement. Why? Because the level of commoditization of the product delineates how much marketing, promotion and relationship-building is required to sell the product.

(And when I say “marketing,” I mean all types of marketing, from branding to pricing to availability to distribution.)

To give you some examples, a “convenience product” is one often purchased to fulfill immediate needs. The purchase is done at an almost unconscious level, too. Pricing is often moderate to low, and brand equity, reputation and relationships do not make a big difference if any.

The product has penetrated the market en masse. It is widely available. And more often than not, convenience products are impulse purchases. They are also staples, in most cases.

Take, for example, bread, milk, batteries, etc. These are often the types of products you find in convenience stores or in the supermarket checkout lines, where people just grab them and add them to their orders just because “they’re there.”

No real thought has been given into making the buying decision. Price may either be low or a non-issue, in most cases. And copy, if any is used, will be relatively short and brief. A small POP display (point of purchase stand, cardboard ad, logo with product name and description, etc) is all that’s required.

As for “shopping products,” those are less commoditized products. They are a little higher in price. A little more thought is required into making the purchase. And people tend to “shop around” when deciding on buying such products.

They either weigh the pros and cons before buying it, or they make the decision to buy relatively quickly — albeit less quickly than a convenience product.

Other times, they take a bit of time to decide, depending on the price, the availability and the market. They will analyze first, and they often require a bit more copy to gather enough information to justify their decision.

Products like cars, appliances, computers, etc are shopping products. (They can be more or less in price too, such as videos, movies, homes, vacations, even software and online services.)

As such, a little longer copy is required, often to differentiate the product from its competitors, and sell the uniqueness and the specific benefits of the product.

Third is the “specialty product.” This is a product that definitely needs more copy and a lot of selling is required. Specialty products are higher priced, highly targeted and more valuable — especially for very specific target markets.

(That is, they might not be of any value for others but of high value for a select group of individuals.)

Exotic goods, luxury cars, expensive jewelry, art and so on are specialty items. Take Mont-Blanc pens, Porsche cars and Pearson yachts, for example.

(A popular magazine is the Robb Report, which is a magazine for the affluent. Take a look at some of the ads in it, and you’ll see exactly what I mean.)

In my marketing classes, the example given was a particular brand of gourmet bread that was gluten-free, created with an exotic herd of mountain sheep’s milk grazing on the alpine slopes, flavored with rare spices and condiments grown in the Amazon jungle, fire-oven baked to very specific temperatures, and gift-wrapped inside a special, ornamentally carved wooden box shipped directly to people’s doors.

(And yes, a loaf can cost you up to $500 each.)

Therefore, longer copy is definitely needed in this case. The goal would be not to differentiate it from its competition (since there’s very little of it) but to create value, justify the purchase and add reasons why.

In other words, why would someone pay $500 for a loaf of bread? There are very specific individuals who would and very specific reasons they would, too.

Finally, “unsought products” are exactly that: unsought. Products that no one would have ever known about or looked for. Now, this doesn’t mean exotic and fancy products, either. This means products people don’t necessarily look for or believe they don’t need. At first.

Preventative type products fall in that category (i.e., life insurance, pre-arranged funeral services, financial investment services, etc). Almost all information products fall in that category too, by the way. (If not, they probably fall in the “specialty” category.)

Consequently, long copy is a must in these cases. And the copy is not only meant to differentiate, add value and justify the purchase, but also to create a need and a desire for the product.

What I mean is, you need a lot of copy to educate the market on why they need (and subsequently want) this type of product. You need a lot of copy to really build a compelling case for buying it.

Granted, these categories are not universal. Because another element comes in, which is the second one in my list mentioned earlier.

And that is, the process.

The process can help identify, isolate or even create certain markets (and therefore certain mindsets) that will buy a product with more or less copy. And that process is not limited to words — or to selling itself, for that matter.


Long copy is often attributed to a long copy salesletter. But that is not often the case. Copy is not limited to a salesletter or website. It can often take many forms, take place over time, and communicated and delivered in many different ways.

When all added, they take the form of, and replace, a long copy salesletter that would otherwise be required if none of these other steps were taken.

For example, if you have an affiliate program, then your affiliates can and should “pre-sell” the product for you. Their “copy,” in other words, is part of the entire sales engine. When they hit your site, and if they’re highly targeted and qualified from moment they hit it, then you need less copy to sell them.

In fact, if your affiliates did their jobs right, they’ve already sold your prospects even before they read your copy.

Even if your affiliate (or even yourself, when you sell to an established list of paying clients) doesn’t use a lot of copy to pre-sell, the “uncommunicated” copy was delivered in the form of building the brand (and that brand can also be you and your expertise), trust, credibility and relationships.

For example, when you promote a new product to an established audience (or if your affiliates promote your product to their established lists), a relationship already exists. The process didn’t start with that promotion but a long time ago.

How many times have you already sold this audience in the past? If you have done so, particularly several times, the likelihood that little copy will be required for the next promotion.

You don’t need copy to build credibility or educate your market, in this case, because that job has already been done.

In other words, copy was already used, albeit indirectly.

How much copy in other promotions have you used? How many times did they read your articles, websites and blog posts before they bought from you? How great is the relationship you created with them before you sold them anything? How much did they read about, learned from and educated themselves on: you, your expertise, your business or even your affiliates’ businesses?

That’s copy. All of it.

It’s all part of the sales process. And “copy,” in the case of selling to an established, qualified market, didn’t start with that salesletter. It started a long time ago through other means.

Try to sell to a brand new market for the first time, one who has never heard of you, and you’ll need copy. Lots of it.

Hire a sales representative to sell for you, and that’s copy too, albeit delivered incrementally, in different ways, over time. For example, include all the prospecting steps, qualification questions, needs analyses, phone calls, sales presentations, written proposals, objections handled, and closing attempts the salesperson did.

But it’s still all one big piece of copy. Remove all of those steps and start fresh with just a salesletter, and you will definitely need a long copy salesletter. Without question.

In other words, if you had to replace all those steps with just one, the process would have taken the form of one long-copy salesletter.

Finally, there’s also a correlation between my two points, i.e., between product categories and processes.

Because a product, which may at first be an unsought product — with a bit of copy, awareness, brand equity and credibility built over time — can change and be promoted to another category.

They can go from unsought, to specialty, to shopping, and even to convenience, after a specific point in the sales/life cycle.

Take bottled water, for instance.

Bottled water was once unsought when it was first introduced. Over time, it became a specialty product. After a while, it then became a shopping product.

(And in some cases, I’d even venture to say that bottled water is now a convenience product, especially in certain markets such as gyms, schools, offices or certain locales where water quality is known to be poor.)

So when you really look at it and think about it, long copy always wins. Always. It’s just not a long copy salesletter every time. Granted, after a period of time, it’s not always needed when the audience is pre-sold, or when the product is a low-priced convenience product.

Bottom line, copy doesn’t need to do a job that’s already been done. So the question is not “how long should your salesletter be?” But rather, “how qualified, targeted and sold is my target market before they even read my salesletter?”

And therein lies the key: the market, not the copy.

About the Author

Michel Fortin is a direct response copywriter, author, speaker, consultant, and CEO of The Success Doctor, Inc. Visit his blog and signup free to get tested conversion strategies and response-boosting tips by email, along with blog updates, news, and more! Go now to http://www.michelfortin.com.

Last 5 Posts by Michel Fortin

Share This Post

Share this post with a friend by clicking "share this" below. You may freely reprint or redistribute this article, provided the content and links are left intact, and the "about the author" section is included. Get notified of new posts by RSS or email, below.

RSS Feed email updates Email Updates
Your First Copywriting Client In 14 Days Or Less  

Your First Copywriting Client In 14 Days Or Less

New! Discover this copywriter's personal system for getting copywriting clients in as few as 14 days. It includes both online and offline marketing strategies. Click for more »

Other Related Posts

Readers Also Viewed

21 Replies to “Short Copy Outperforms? Heresy!”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. From Can I Make Big Money Online

    Short Copy vs. Long Copy

    I have been trying to decide whether Jill and her brother’s business would best be suited by short copy or long copy on their main page. We may test out both, but I found this brand new post on Michel Fortin’s blog to really help clarify the times when…

    Source Website April 2nd, 2006

Comments

  1. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Paul

    There are plenty of A/B split tests that prove long copy converts better than short copy.

    Also, context cash underlining makes copy extremely difficult to read. I would dump it.

    Author's Website March 31st, 2006

  2. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Drayton Bird

    1. After nearly 50 years at this game, I have never seen good short copy making the same proposition outperform good long copy in a split run - in any category.

    2. I’m not sure you’re right about the brand not mattering with convenience products; I think the brand matters just as much with unconsidered buys; indeed, it may matter more as it “substitutes” for thought

    Author's Website March 31st, 2006

  3. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Rebecca Wolf

    Thank you for helping me to see my market’s journey through the entire sale process, rather than just fixating on one sales letter.

    It is helping me to look at the sale experience through their eyes, which will help me write my copy at all points of contact in a more cohesive and purposeful way.

    I appreciate the amount of thought and time you put into your posts. Thanks for sharing!

    Author's Website March 31st, 2006

  4. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Barry Densa

    Had I only been a student of yours when you were teaching.

    Excellent Article. Truly.

    –Barry

    Author's Website March 31st, 2006

  5. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Barry Bassnett

    Interesting. Just a slightly different spin on this subject. I think we would all agree that the fundamental task of copy is risk alleviation. This morning I have just bought something on line without thinking. Two minutes later I downloaded 32 pages of a sales letter. Both accomplished the same task, both for similar types of product. (The latter ‘journey’ albeit somewhat painful and involved passing through the city of ‘lost the will to live’). But here is a case in point. If something pops into my in-tray from Michael or Drayton I’ll open it straight away. If I get one of their sales letters, to be honest, I probably wouldn’t read it all the way through, just scroll to the end to see where the price is er . well find it anyway. I’d buy it without the roster of testimonials, without all the added bonuses just because if it‘s a Portin product I know it is going to be worthwhile. (Plus, being a copywriter, I know what the methods are although I’d read it out of professional interest).

    Michael (and I am sure he is over the moon about this) is a brand. On the other hand, if I don’t know the guy, and I’m positive the same happened the first time I came across Michael, then he or she has to lead me on the path to comfort.

    I ‘d go one step further than Michael. Its not about the market its about the product. The security of a brand actually can accomplish magically what it would need tons of copy to convey. The same can be applied to all sorts of other products. However one man’s ‘brand’ is another man’s “Who they hell are they?” Michael’s problem and the challenge we all share is to craft a pitch to the numbers. Copy that will convert those who are first encountering the product, those who are already converts and loyal customers and those who would buy anything that has that label on it.

    I seem to remember an old article of Drayton’s which discussed the long v short copy argument twenty years ago; it all depends how long the piece of string you need to wrap it up is. There is no formula guys so don’t bother looking for one. Just write better copy. Long v short split isn’t really the point As they say, 86% of statistics are made up on the spur of the moment.

    Author's Website April 1st, 2006

  6. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Eugene Engdahl

    “Long or short, to make the sale is all I ask.”

    In public speaking - “The mind can endure only as long as the bottom can.” What is the audience level of knowledge, why did they come, what do they need to learn? A lecture on glyconutrients needs to be taylored for a dietitian, an herbalist, a surgeon or a weight watcher. Although each may have an interest in micro-biology and the role of glyconutrients, they probably should not be together in the same room.

    Copy is the same: It must be directed to the proper audience and delivered in a manner that will be read and understood. Selling another book on marketing should go to a targeted receptive client. I get tons of well written copy in my mail box, that I pass from one hand to the basket because I’m not interested. It did not get my attention. Please, no more bathing beauties sitting on top of BMW’s.
    Why would I refinance my home when it is paid for? Sell me a hacienda in Costa Rica? Got to tell me why?
    Every sales letter should answer the question “Why?”. Why is the promotion being offered from the presenter’s position, and why should the recipient be interested?
    Go back to - build a need, then fill that need. Long or short, no refinance promotion will get my attention unless I have a need for it, or it is in my best interests. That may take some undertaking with a campaign to build attention - to stop copy from going to the circular file - and then build desire.
    A short letter may be more endurable to me than a long presentation. Get my attention first, then I will be receptive to more information once I understand why I need it. Long or short copy has its own place. What is important is knowing where it belongs.
    ERE

    Author's Website April 1st, 2006

  7. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Hakim Chishti

    RE: “Long Versus Short Copy”

    A few remarks may serve as “food for thought” for some of marketers who are trying to make up their minds on this fascinating issue.

    Here’s my reasoning on how the “long versus short copy” issue got started, and why it is where it is today.

    “In split run tests, long copy invariably outsells short copy.” — “Ogilvy on Advertising”, 1980 or so.

    The famous ad that launched the whole “long copy” issue has of course come to be known as “the Rolls Royce ad”. Many posters here know it.

    Indeed, it is a classic. At the time it ran, it was a wild departure from the “typical” kinds of ads — usually no more than 10 - 100 words.

    David Ogilvy was the one (or his ad agency) who developed that campaign. It ran under the now-famous headline:

    “At 60 miles an hour the loudest noise in this new Rolls-Royce comes from the electric clock.”

    The ad contains about 580 words. THAT was long copy in those days, a full display ad page, either magazine or newspaper. That contrasted sharply to what was the alternative in those days, usually short “blurb” or catalog description copy.

    The Ogilvy ad sold out the entire U.S. inventory of Rolls Royce automobiles when it ran. That’s a remarkable feat.

    I agree that in skilled hands, longer ads will usually easily out pull, say catalog bitlets, classified ads, or quarter-page display ads, etc. — up to around 250 words.

    But it is wrong to claim, as so many “guru” copywriters do today, that IN EVERY CASE long copy will out pull short copy.

    I have written direct mail copy for many very famous clients over the past 40 years — including all of the State Farm insurance agent direct mailing pieces for several years (thousands of letters sent to many millions of recipients), plus American Airlines, Texaco, Caterpillar & many others.

    We did the very first one-million copy catalog mailing in the US, back in the 1950s — the Foster Gallagher Christmas Catalog. At the time it was the largest single mailing ever dropped by a private mailer. So we did a LOT of testing. I still do.

    I would like to know, for example, if a well-known marketer EVER TESTED his “million dollar day” sales letter at 50,000 words, at 10,000 words, and at 3,000 words?

    Recently one sales letter sent to me was more than 55,000 words “long.” That’s a NOVEL, not a sales letter!

    I have sold $650,000 worth of a single health-related course — using about 1,280 words on the single sales page.

    My point is that it is NOT TRUE that long copy ALWAYS outsells short copy. It needs to be defined more precisely to have any meaning at all. How short is short; and how long is long? That is the question.

    Although I believe copywriters who say they have in fact tested 8, 12, 24 and 32 page magalog style offers, I do not believe all of the
    people who repeat this mantra actually do test all of the long and short permutations.

    Even less do I think 80 and 90 pages of “copy” are required to try to sell online. It easily can be done with much less copy by skilled writers.

    If it were true in EVERY CASE that long copy outsells short copy, then BMOC, Phillips, Rodale and all the others would ONLY send 32 page and larger packages. And of course they do not.

    I know we have ads that repeatedly sell more than a million dollars with just under 5,000 or so carefully-crafted words of direct sales copy.

    There HAS TO BE some upper limit … because according to the claim (”longer will ALWAYS outsell shorter”) a 14,000 page sales letter would ALWAYS outsell a 10 page sales letter. Who would even test it? Who would even write it!

    For myself that I am terribly WEARY of trying to chop through what is best described as truly mediocre copy (most all of the copy I encounter online these days), to see “if” there is even a product there. Or do they only want me to “pre-register? Or sign up for teleseminar? Or pre-sign up for a workshop? Or … fuggedaboudit!

    The real key is focusing on what’s important to your market and giving them the high points.

    Hakim Chishti

    Author's Website April 1st, 2006

  8. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Cathy Goodwin

    Michel reinforced the key message: Know your market and your product. Any rule has exceptions.

    For instance, “Benefits only - no features!” Bob Bly has pointed out that product experts want lots of details on features. And in fact psychologists find that experts make decisions differently from novices, for just about any product.

    Author's Website April 1st, 2006

  9. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Alan Allard

    I am reminded of what Dave Allard, who was trained by Gary Halbert, often says: “In the final analysis, the only thing of real importance is : what will create maximum results at this point in time, for this market? And the only way to know is to test each and every time. Short copy, long copy…whatever works best in the moment!”

    Author's Website April 1st, 2006

  10. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Drayton

    Here’s a thought from someone wiser than anyone reading this - John Caples - and an underlying truth from someone smarter than even Caples - Claude Hopkins.

    1. Hopkins noted in th best chapter of his “Scientific Advertising” that what we do is “Just salesmanship”. All our efforts are just substitutes for what a brilliant salesman would do - but we can’t afford to send a salesman to all prospects, so we use cheaper media.

    2. Caples said, “Would a salesman give you one reason to buy today, then another tomorrow - and so on? That would be crazy”.

    There seems an underlying, inescapable logic to this, from two remarkable people - and I recall David Ogilvy telling me over dinner in Frankfurt some years ago that he was once talking to Rosser Reeves (who was actually his brother in law) and they agreed that everything they knew, they learned from John Caples.

    Of course you may say, “But what Caples said was years ago”. Caples also said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, “Times change; people don’t”.

    Best,

    Drayton

    Author's Website April 2nd, 2006

  11. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Drayton Bird

    (In response to Hakim Chishti:)

    How very true.

    D O, whom I worked with for about 8 years, was very didactic on this; he once said “I believe long copy works even if people don’t read it, because they think you have something important to say.”

    I beliee the two most dangerous words in our business may be “never” and “always”.

    Because we can measure everything, we tend to draw general conclusions from particular cases, or series of cases, which are not universally true - ie, since generally long copy beats short, you should always run long copy.

    But I tdon’t you agree that two things must, surely, apply most times:

    1. If you omit from your copy any sensible reason why the prospect should do what you suggest, you will lose sales.

    2. If you fail to deal, in your copy, with any sensible objection the prospect may have to doing what you suggest, you will lose sales.

    Does that make sense?

    Best

    Drayton

    Author's Website April 2nd, 2006

  12. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Hakim Chishti

    Drayton,

    I agree with all your points.

    Very few people have the expertise or expend the effort required to write superior sales copy.

    It is a true honor to “meet” you here, after having read and benefited from your “How to Write Sales Letters That Sell” for many years. I have a copy of the original 1994 edition. It is one of the great classics on copywriting. Thank you for writing it. I especially like your points about “the customer’s point of view.” Superb tips and insights.

    Hakim Chishti

    Author's Website April 3rd, 2006

  13. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Barry Bassnett

    Hakim and anybody else out there. You should check out this book too if you haven’t already. Here is a quote.

    ‘Is it the right length?’

    ‘The length should fit the objective. If your object is easy to achieve you probably don’t need to say much. If the product is cheap, the same will be true. If, on the other hand, you wish to sell a very expensive product or convey a complicated proposition then use the necessary amount of words - but no more.’

    This quote comes from the bible of copywriting, Commonsense Direct Marketng by Mr Drayton Bird. I’ve had a copy on my desk been 1982 and when that felll apart from constant use, 1989 when the second edition came along. This book gave me a career I love. I’ve never had the chance to meet him and thank him personally but If I could do so now. Drayton, Thanks so, so much. There is nothing common about your commonsense.

    Barry Bassnett, Yorkshire

    Author's Website April 4th, 2006

  14. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Chad

    When I write copy I don’t distinguish between long or short copy, I just write what I think is needed.

    Some products only take 2 pages and others require much more.

    I never cut or shorten any part of my copy simply to make it shorter.

    When I buy something, I like to absorb every bit of information about it before buying and it’s the copy with the most information that usually gets my business.

    Author's Website April 4th, 2006

  15. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Drayton Bird

    Thanks, Hakim.

    It’s a better book than the one that sells better - Commonsense DM - and funnily enough I am in the middle of lecturing on the subject to120 people here in Tasmania — not bad for a total population of 480,000! Clearly they have nothing better to do.

    Author's Website April 4th, 2006

  16. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Drayton Bird

    Thanks very much, Barry.

    I’ve just finished doing three copy seminars in Australia … and I’m now in Sydney busy revising that book for its 5th edition.

    Funnily enough, I was up in Yorkshire a few weeks ago. doing a talk in Leeds.

    Talking about it is so much easier than doing it - but I probably write more copy now than I ever have. I’m hoping to get it right eventually!

    Best,

    Drayton

    Author's Website April 5th, 2006

  17. MyAvatars 0.2

    From sky

    It might be said that long-er copy sells bett-er. Like if there are 2 brands of milk on the shelf. One says “MILK” and the other is higher priced and has more copy to explain why its better. Or maybe even lower priced because its local. The long-er copy wins.

    But yes, if it too long, I might pick the MILK.

    Author's Website April 9th, 2006

  18. MyAvatars 0.2

    From AndyOwen

    I have to say that in all the tests I have been personally involved in, long copy has always perfomed better.

    Always. Not one exception…

    I don’t think it’s about long or short anyway. I think it’s about interesting or not interesting.

    If you take 5 pages to write about something that only warrants 3 pages, you’ll lose the reader because you’ll be waffling…

    On the other hand, if you try to cram on one page, a selling message that needs 3, then you’ll fail because the message delivery will look like a dog’s breakfast…

    Andy

    Author's Website April 10th, 2006

  19. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Chuck McKay

    Long vs Short? Wrong question. The right question is: How much persuasion does the prospective customer require to be comfortable making the purchase?

    I wrote about this at length (no pun intended) in: fishingforcustomers.blogspot.com/2005/08/long-and-short-of-p…

    Author's Website April 11th, 2006

  20. MyAvatars 0.2

    From Mike

    I have tried several versions of long copy, written by the “top” copywriters on the net, to never see my conversions go up.

    I would never say long copy doesn’t work, but it depends on the market in my opinion.

    And on the web, people don’t have (or take) the time to read a 19 page sales letter. I can vouch for this with my site.

    The novelty of grabbing a cup of coffee and spending hours on the web are over. People get to a web page and want to know what you offer and how it will help them, as quickly as possible and with no hype.

    Just my 2 cents:-)

    Author's Website April 17th, 2006

Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate  

Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

New! Paul Hancox combines direct selling and copywriting techniques to produce online conversion rates as high as 10%. His 127-page report shows you how. Click for more »

Leave a Reply




Comments will be sent to the moderation queue.

 

Home | About | Sitemap | Coaching | Consulting | Members | Main | Forum | Ezine | Services | FAQ | Privacy | Legal | TOP

Michel Fortin, CEO of the copywriting agency, The Success Doctor, Inc.

© 1997-2008 The Success Doctor, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1707 Cara Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario (Canada) K4A1M4
Telephone/24-Hour Fax: (613) 482-4828 | Contact Me

RSS Feed