Start Your Own Business or Grow an Existing One

Hundreds of step-by-step video tutorials and tools show you how to find profitable markets, get product ideas, source the best products to sell, build profitable websites easily, and drive qualified traffic. Plus, discover how to outsource it all.

Everything you need to start or grow your own highly profitable web business — regardless of size or model.

  • 1,000s of ready-to-sell products
  • Ideal for any skill level or business
  • Learn anywhere, anytime, 24/7
  • Use it risk-free for a full 30 days

Want More? Click Here For Details »


How to Improve Your Email Open Rates

How to Improve Your Email Open Rates

Email marketing subject linesWith spam inces­santly inun­dat­ing our inboxes and people’s atten­tion spans con­stantly shrink­ing, some have claimed that email mar­ket­ing is on the way out.

I say “nonsense.”

In fact, it’s because of those very rea­sons that email mar­ket­ing is now stronger than ever before. I per­son­ally know of some mar­keters who have made lit­er­ally mil­lions of dol­lars with email mar­ket­ing alone in recent weeks.

I’m talk­ing about legit­i­mate, law-​​compliant, optin email.

Remem­ber, the most com­mon use of the Inter­net is still email — not instant mes­sen­g­ing, social net­work­ing, or brows­ing web­sites. It’s often the very first thing peo­ple do when they log onto the web.

Granted, the biggest stum­bling block is to increase your “open rate” (i.e., the per­cent­age of peo­ple who actu­ally open your emails). And to do so you first need to get your emails deliv­ered and over­come overzeal­ous spam fil­ters.

But once they do reach your read­ers’ inboxes, the most impor­tant step in get­ting your mes­sages through to your audi­ence is with good copy. And like a good head­line in sales copy, it all starts with the sub­ject line.

One thing you may have noticed, par­tic­u­larly of late, are clever head­lines spam­mers use.

Spam sub­ject lines are often a lazy tac­tic to improve open rates. How many times have you seen a head­line in your inbox, only to real­ize that the email is try­ing to sell you some sleazy, snake-​​oil aphrodisiac?

In other words, you get emails with head­lines that may seem legit­i­mate, but the moment you open them your “Delete” but­ton gets the brunt of your index finger.

Sure, curios­ity may get you to open the email. But they usu­ally end up in the trash if they’re not in your spam folder already.

That said, how­ever, spammy head­lines do have some­thing to teach us.

You can improve your open rates using some of the same tac­tics spam­mers use, but in legit­i­mate, confidence-​​inspiring ways that will increase read­er­ship and, of course, response.

Here are three of my favorite and eas­i­est tac­tics I use to increase my open rates.

1. Urgency

Urgency says it all. It’s when your sub­ject line com­mu­ni­cates some­thing time-​​sensitive or quantity-​​bound, which sim­ply can’t be ignored.

Some of the most prof­itable email cam­paigns have sub­ject lines that have some ele­ment of scarcity. You see this with sub­ject lines like, “It ends tonight at mid­night!”, “There are only 4 left”, “One spot just opened up”, etc.

While the above are exam­ples of direct scarcity (i.e., the limit is directly stated in the sub­ject line), indi­rect scarcity works well, too — such as an upcom­ing event, hol­i­day, sale, launch, con­test, sea­son, news item, etc.

But don’t just limit your­self to an event. You can also use sit­u­a­tions to com­mu­ni­cate fear of loss, which inher­ently cre­ates ten­sion. For example:

  • When she learned my secrets…”
  • Unless you do this, you are lost!”
  • The sneaky mind trick they use on you”
  • You are los­ing money right now!”
  • Are you aware of these 5 dan­ger signs?”
  • Avoid these 7 mis­takes at all costs!”

Fear of loss is one of our biggest moti­va­tors as human beings. While the urgency may be indi­rectly stated, it’s com­pounded: there’s urgency in the topic itself, as well as urgency in miss­ing out or fail­ing to at least know about it.

Speak­ing of “need to know,” this leads me to my sec­ond point…

2. Curios­ity

Curios­ity pulls them in. And the eas­i­est way — it’s not the best way but it’s effec­tive nonethe­less — to use this win­ning tac­tic is to start a sen­tence, add an ellipse, and con­tinue the rest of the sen­tence in your email.

These teasers can often drive response rates through the roof. Based on the Zeir­gar­nik effect, peo­ple are intrin­si­cally curi­ous, and an unfin­ished idea will cre­ate a cer­tain ten­sion that will force read­ers to seek closure.

For exam­ple, the sub­ject line starts with “It all started when…” and in the body of the email, it goes on with “… She told me about this web­site!” The sub­ject says “I’ve never had a chance to…” fol­lowed in the email by “… tell you about this amaz­ing secret!” Or the sub­ject says “Don’t leave me…” con­tin­ued with “… hang­ing by not respond­ing to this offer.” You get the picture.

How­ever, an impor­tant caveat.

Subject-​​line teasers need to be han­dled very care­fully. It’s easy to lose cred­i­bil­ity. They can come off too spammy and, if your email doesn’t fol­low through on the sub­ject line, then you’ve lost credibility.

That’s why the best curios­ity sub­ject lines are those that really tease not by omis­sion but by impli­ca­tion. In fact, one curiosity-​​building tac­tic that works quite well is to tempt an open by imply­ing that the answer to a ques­tion is within your email.

To help you, take a look at the head­lines on the cov­ers of tabloids and grocery-​​rack mag­a­zines, such as Van­ity Fair, Cosmo, National Enquirer, etc. Here’s one from Women’s World mag­a­zine, sit­ting right now on my wife’s desk: “I lost 19 pounds eat­ing choco­late!” Other exam­ples include:

  • The real rea­son peo­ple gain weight”
  • No joke! Shock­ing study proves laugh­ter is dangerous”
  • Is he cheat­ing? Find out with these 6 tell-​​tale tips”
  • 7 med­ical myths even doc­tors believe

That last exam­ple uses the third com­mon tactic…

3. Con­tro­versy

Con­tro­versy is another pow­er­ful tac­tic. The word “con­tro­ver­sial,” by def­i­n­i­tion, means “of a diverg­ing view­point,” “opin­ion­ated,” “dis­puted,” “arguable,” “con­tentious,” etc. Being con­tro­ver­sial sim­ply means to be different.

While your sub­ject line may raise eye­brows and con­vey sur­prise, dis­may, even anger, it doesn’t need to, and prob­a­bly shouldn’t offend. Instead, tie your sub­ject line to a cur­rent event, news item, or hot topic.

You don’t have to limit your­self to your indus­try. You can use con­tro­ver­sial top­ics out­side of it, as long as you link them to some­thing rel­e­vant to your read­ers and pro­vide com­pelling rea­sons why in your email to jus­tify its use.

One of my email coach­ing stu­dents, John Rit­skowitz, in an email about the power of head­lines, used “Dead Man Wakes Up Under Autopsy Knife.”

This was pulled from an actual, recent news story. And John used that head­line to show the power of head­lines in a small video tuto­r­ial for a new copy­writ­ing tool he was promoting.

(If you want to know more about it, check out John’s prod­uct, “The Copy­writ­ers Toolkit.” I highly rec­om­mend it. You’ll have access to the above tool as well as many others.)

Take a look at some of the head­lines I’ve used over the years on this very blog…

Speak­ing of being con­tro­ver­sial, another suc­cess­ful tac­tic I’ve seen — and con­trary to com­mon knowl­edge — is to NOT include the email recipient’s name in the sub­ject line.

There are many ben­e­fits to per­son­al­iz­ing emails, and I still rec­om­mend it with email body copy — or any copy, for that matter.

But like with any mar­ket­ing tac­tic, once a win­ning strat­egy is overused we tend to become desen­si­tized to it.

I sus­pect that the recipient’s name in the sub­ject line is often an indi­ca­tion that it is a sales mes­sage, and the email will likely hit the trash can faster than you can say “spam!”

By the way, Larry Chase’s “Web Digest For Mar­keters,” an ezine I’ve been sub­scribed to for many years, has an inter­est­ing arti­cle on 13 tips for craft­ing sub­ject lines.

Bot­tom line, observe what spam­mers are doing, and apply some of the same tac­tics to your email mar­ket­ing efforts. But don’t be clever or misleading.

In the long run, you’re bet­ter off to spend a lit­tle time using what we can learn from spam and cre­at­ing a sub­ject line that will really work. The key is to be rel­e­vant — to your email mes­sage, and more impor­tantly, to your readers.

About the Author

Last 5 Posts By Michel Fortin

Other Related Posts


Share
Category: Articles
This post was written on Friday, December 28th, 2007. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Your First Copywriting Client In 14 Days Or Less

Your First Copywriting Client In 14 Days Or Less

New! Discover this copywriter's personal system for getting copywriting clients in as few as 14 days. It includes both online and offline marketing strategies. Click for more »

  • Another great post as always! I especially like the portion about using someones name in the Subject line. I too have always heard (and adhered to) using their first name whenever I send out an email.

    I look forward to keeping that out of the email and seeing what comes of it.

    Thanks for the advice!
  • Good points Michel.

    One really dumb thing that a lot of marketers started doing was misspelling, to fool the filters. Those early filters were set up to reject common marketing words such as buy, purchase, free. At the email company I worked at, my approach was unlike SpamAssassin. If people used correct spelling, they had nothing to worry about. The marketers who used spelling obfuscation often had their messages zapped.

    Not only that, but the obfuscation makes it really difficult to read. Steven Pierce does that in his emails ... "Unique Sel.ling Proposition" "want to bu.y".

    In his email today, he talks about forming relationships with readers, but he is destroying that relationship by making his email hard to read.

    The key to getting delivered is not to break up the English language and make your message hard to read, but to form a relationship with your readers and have them whitelist/greenlist you. That's what I do at NewsBlaze.com

    As you suggest, personalization is also important. Looking back at your spam idea - how many fake PayPal emails have you received in the past few years? What is the defining difference between a real and fake paypal email. The most obvious thing is that PayPal knows your name and uses it in the message. The scammers don't know who you are so you are "Dear PayPal member".

    Happy New Year.
  • Dear Michel!

    You have hammered soft point... hardly!

    I have actually used some of them even for my personal e-mailing and it works effectively.

    Thanks a lot.

    Murtaza.
  • Jay
    Well done, Michel. From a guy who makes a majority of his living writing emails for clients, you hit the proverbial nail on the head.

    Twoquestions: Do you have any guidelines for the styling of the subject line? I've always went initial cap, but if you've had better response with all lower case, I'd love to know.

    Also, what about subject line length? I've always tried to shoot for 25 characters or less, but was never sure if that affected the open rate or not.

    JW
  • @Jay:

    In some cases, all lower case, or just sentence case (first letter only is capitalized), outpulled "headlinish" subjects where all words' first letters are capitalized.

    But I think it's all a question about how you connect with your readers. And "connection" and relevancy, here, is the crux of it all.

    Frank Kern does his subject lines in all lower case. And it works, because Frank is known to have a laid-back, no-nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is style. And that's why his emails pull well.

    But it doesn't mean it's the same across the board.

    Subject line length also depends. But in this case, it's really a matter of playing the lowest common denominator. Less than 25 characters is good. Some subject lines, especially in webmail services like Hotmail or Gmail, truncate them.

    For others, it depends on screen resolutions. For the wider the resolution, the bigger the email software opens up on the screen and therefore the longer the subject line can be, without being truncated.

    But again, just like sticking with smaller tables for web copy to appeal to all monitor resolutions, I think it's safe to stick with the lowest common denominator. Personally, I think 25 is a bit low (I prefer 30 or even 40), but it's still a pretty good goal to aim for.
  • Hi Michel!

    When you write, "most people check email first", you are right. I see it in Internet cafes, ... , and every weekend guest visiting us wants at least to check their email from my home office.

    Would you share your opinion and experience on personalization in the subject line?

    Some marketers use the 'first name' and a welcome phrase. I have seen dates as well, and you begin the subject line with '[Michel Fortin]' (for your Blog announcements).

    In 25, 30, 40 characters there is not much room? Would you rather use it for personalization (probably not) or to create the much needed urgency, curiosity, or controversy.

    Yours
    John
    P.S. Happy and successful new year.
  • @John:

    Not sure I understand your first question, since I covered that in my blog post (about personalization in subject lines). The bottom line is to test -- send a bunch of emails with personalization, and a bunch without, and see which one pulls best.

    But in my own tests, personalization in subject lines are lower in response, and my theory, as I mentioned in my post, is that people are desensitized to personalization.

    (Granted, adding the name in the middle or at the end, in some cases, pulled better. Like, "I want to know, Michel, if you like this...")

    I tested my emails with and without the bracketed branding. And bracketed branding did outpull non-bracketed ones. I suspect it's because people have filters to recognize mail coming from me, to look for subject lines like [Michel Fortin]. But my guess is as good as yours.

    (That said, I'm a BIG proponent of branding!)

    The third question is what I specifically covered in my post. Focus on urgency, controversy or scarcity, instead of personalization.
  • Nice post Michael.

    One of the subjects you didn't touch on is how to use the sequence of your emails to keep your list responsive.

    I experimented for quite some time with sending a couple of emails leading to high quality content THEN an email leading to a pitch.

    Then I realized how dumb that was and moved to creating high quality content as a lead in to all the products I was marketing.

    A large portion of your open rate is dependent on the relationship you've built with your subscribers.

    Think about how you check your email.

    Don't you scan the From line first and stop on the messages that are from someone who's in your "good" books.

    If you're ALWAYS sending links to high quality content you're going to build trust and your open rate will most likely be far higher than sending your subscribers to one sales letter after another.


    On the subject of personalization I would say the biggest reason the response is lower is because the personalization makes no sense.

    In many cases personalization is just someone's name jammed into a subject line because that's supposed to increase your open rate.

    It's a lot like really amateur sales people who use your name too much..off putting and annoying.

    Kindest regards,
    Andrew Cavanagh
  • There's one other thing that I think helps that I didn't read above before.

    I think it's really important that you, the sender, keep a close relationship with your list and communicate with them (send them e-mails) often. Over time, they'll begin to recognize your name. Your name, I think, will eventually play a greater role in getting your e-mail opened than most headlines will.

    You see, when I scroll through my e-mail inbox, I look at the left-hand column first: who is more important than what. By that I mean that I look for the people I respect the most or am most interested in, then, when I see their name, I open their e-mail without much regard for what the headline is.

    I know this is a bit of an extreme way of looking at things, but I bet you more people sroll like me than you'd realize.
  • @Michel Fortin:
    Thanks. I mistook your link list of headlines for the related posts section, jumped all the way down to the comment form, and skipped your text on personalization totally. Uups! Sorry.
  • Alex
    What about putting a benefit in the headline ... does that work if you're mailing to a niche market?
  • I thought the email you sent out with the title "what we can learn from criminals" was going to be about Gary Halbert!

    Don't get me wrong.. I know Gary was no criminal. I read his whole story. And in no way do I think he was ever a criminal.

    Sorry,, had to post that. Thought it might make you laugh as well.

    Regards,

    Jeff
  • Really great post Michael!
  • @Alex:

    Yes, it can still work. But lately, I've found that intrigue and newsy headlines do better, especially with email. And intrigue is definitely a big part of the three tactics in my post. Again, the obvious solution is to test.
  • Barnabas Ng
    Hi Michel

    Love the post and timely for me.

    I have check out Larry Chase's "Web Digest For Marketers. Great and informative site.

    And I believe the 3 tactics you shared would work equally well for any salesletter or website.

    Thanks
  • John James
    I do find it a challenge to get people to open emails. I thought it was because I couldn't write very well, so I hired a Bellevue Wa Copywriter. I'll have to wait and see how this works out for me.
  • Awesome tips Michel. But when your member (my word for subscriber) trusts you, everything becomes easier.

    So getting your email read (after the spam filter test) is a work that should be done BEFORE the prospect subscribes.
  • Great tips, goingto test it out right away, i ll let you know how I get on!
  • awesome information, great advice!
  • Originally Posted By AlexWhat about putting a benefit in the headline ... does that work if you're mailing to a niche market?


    I would definitely say so. Leading with the benefit to your customer is key.

    On that subject you might find
    this email clinic article useful. I am currently doing some work for Pure and they have some great knowledge pieces and tips:

    Email marketing tips
  • ON NPR they had a homeless engineer... when are we going to hear about a homeless lawyer. Enjoyed your blog.
  • I love the controversy tip! It will make people really want to open their email to see what's in it.

    Eric
blog comments powered by Disqus
Pinpoint Hungry And Highly Profitable Markets

Pinpoint Hungry And Highly Profitable Markets

New! Streaming video lessons show you how to identify hungry niches online and how to "read their minds!" Discover what your market wants and how to sell more to existing markets. Click for more »