Build a business and earn and income with hundreds of training tutorials

Start Your Own Business or Grow an Existing One

Hundreds of step-by-step video tutorials and tools show you how to find profitable markets, get product ideas, source the best products to sell, build profitable websites easily, and drive qualified traffic. Plus, discover how to outsource it all.

Everything you need to start or grow your own highly profitable web business — regardless of size or model.

  • 1,000s of ready-to-sell products
  • Ideal for any skill level or business
  • Learn anywhere, anytime, 24/7
  • Use it risk-free for a full 30 days

Want More? Click Here For Details »


Written by Michel Fortin

Eye Gravity Draws Attention And Interest: Study

HeatmapSome of the tests results I love to fol­low are those from The Poyn­ter Insti­tute. Their eye­track­ing stud­ies are some of the largest ever con­ducted in this space.

While their tests are pri­mar­ily done for, and funded by, major news­pa­pers, their stud­ies are incred­i­bly reveal­ing nonethe­less. For instance, they’ve tested how read­ers read sto­ries in three dif­fer­ent for­mats: tabloid-​​style (folded ver­ti­cally), broad­sheet (larger size, folded hor­i­zon­tally), and online.

Of course, my inter­est is cer­tainly focused on the online ver­sion. But their news­pa­per stud­ies are very reveal­ing in terms of what cap­tures people’s atten­tion, how they read, and how much of it they do read.

Their web­site has come out with five key find­ings. (Their full report is due out in a few more weeks from now.) But let’s take a closer look at these find­ings, and my inter­pre­ta­tion of what they mean for the web.

They dis­cov­ered what news source was read more than any other. And the reveal­ing sta­tis­tic here is that 77% read more online. I don’t mean they read more news online. I mean they read more of it online than offline.

Nearly two-​​thirds of online read­ers, once they selected an item to read, read all of the text. This is sur­pris­ing since it was thought, for a long time, that peo­ple scan online more than they do offline.

The truth is, I believe, peo­ple scan more online to find what they want. In fact, one find­ing clas­si­fied read­ers as either method­i­cal or scan­ners. And they found that offline, read­ers are more method­i­cal. About 75%. But online, it’s 50/​50. That is, 50% are scan­ners, and the other 50%, methodical.

But once they found what they want to read online, the study dis­cov­ered that they read it more intently and thoroughly.

Offline, peo­ple are lim­ited by the paper’s num­ber of sto­ries. And the lin­ear read­ing process forces peo­ple to scan through it to find inter­est­ing ele­ments, as opposed to online where they search for the infor­ma­tion they want, or find teaser copy that inter­ests them and then fol­low links to keep reading.

This means sev­eral things. First, blogs are more impor­tant than what was pre­vi­ously thought. But more impor­tantly, excerpts, espe­cially on front pages (whether it’s on a blog or a web­site), tend to drive read­ers deeper into the web­site, and to be more inter­ested in the item they’ve cho­sen to read.

Sec­ond, if peo­ple read more intently once they’ve cho­sen what to read, it means that head­lines, links, and excerpt (e.g., teaser) copy that lead them to this con­tent in the first place is more impor­tant than ever online.

Plus, head­lines and teasers with great copy, espe­cially those using intrigue, curios­ity, and a newsy ele­ment to them, will be cho­sen more often AND be read more intently. So head­line copy, whether it’s on an excerpt (or even those used in tes­ti­mo­ni­als, for exam­ple) or on a page, does mat­ter — and prob­a­bly moreso online.

More­over, excerpts with pho­tos, icons, or graph­ics also help the nav­i­ga­tion process. (I talked about the value of “iconiz­ing” your posts with avatars or icons that rep­re­sent the main idea or ben­e­fit in the content.)

It’s the same with most oper­at­ing sys­tems these days, like Win­dows or Mac. In large part, com­put­ers are icon-​​driven instead of code– or command-​​driven, unlike their pre­de­ces­sors. As Mark Twain once said, peo­ple don’t think in words or num­bers. They think in pictures.

Peo­ple are drawn to pic­tures, and when they see an icon that rep­re­sents what a pro­gram is or does (or in the case of con­tent, what the story is all about), they tend to chose it more, as icons draw the eyes and tell peo­ple what’s in store in just a frac­tion of second.

Some peo­ple have debated the idea of putting full arti­cles on their front page instead of excerpts. It’s still arguable, but I do believe the study points out that adding con­tent teasers, cou­pled with icons that rep­re­sent what the story is all about, will get increased read­abil­ity, inter­est, and response.

In fact, the study also found that large head­lines and pho­tos got more atten­tion. But online, peo­ple are also attracted to teasers and direc­tional ele­ments that guide peo­ple into tak­ing action (such as nav­i­ga­tion links, pho­tos or graph­ics ele­ments with direc­tions, forms, etc.

About pho­tos, here’s some­thing inter­est­ing: the study dis­cov­ered that real, action, color pho­tos got more atten­tion that, say, mugshots, stu­dio, or still pho­tos. (That’s why, for exam­ple, a photo — or even bet­ter, a video — show­ing the indi­vid­ual in action, rather than a still, stu­dio photo, will get bet­ter results.

I often tell my stu­dents who are, for exam­ple, pro­fes­sional speak­ers, to show on their pro­file or “about” pages a shot of them speak­ing on stage, prefer­ably in front of an audi­ence. While it grabs more atten­tion, it also deliv­ers another, more impor­tant ele­ment: social proof.

(If you remem­ber, the pic­ture of John Reese at the top of the Traf­fic Secrets salesletter’s body copy, which I wrote for John, didn’t have his mugshot — like most saleslet­ters — but a photo of him being hounded by audi­ence mem­bers at a seminar.)

Finally, another inter­est­ing find­ing from the study showed that peo­ple are drawn to alter­na­tive story forms, instead of just plain-​​old text — such as Q&A’s, time­lines, side­bars, charts, maps, lists, and so forth.

What does this mean? Add bul­lets to your con­tent or copy. Add pho­tos and graph­ics, par­tic­u­larly if they tell the story them­selves (includ­ing sam­ples, screen­shots, and ele­ments of proof). Even bet­ter, add video and audio.

It’s all part of the “sam­pli­fi­ca­tion” trend I often talked about.

About the Author

Last 5 Posts By Michel Fortin

Other Related Posts


Share
Category: Opinions
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed. You may reprint this article in your own publication or website, provided that you leave the content, the links, and the "about the author" section at the end intact.
Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

Secrets of a 10% Conversion Rate

New! Paul Hancox combines direct selling and copywriting techniques to produce online conversion rates as high as 10%. His 127-page report shows you how. Click for more »