RSS Feed email updates Email Updates

Copy Is Not About Selling, It’s About Serving

Rebirth of Internet Marketing by John ReeseIf you’ve read my report, The Death of The Salesletter, then you know that many of my "predictions" (I’m using quotes for a reason) were based on actual test results. Many of them were made by, or done based on tests from, John Reese.

John is one of my mentors. He’s not only a multi-millionaire but also a visionary. And lately, John has proven this to be true. Recently, he released a fascinating report entitled The Rebirth of Internet Marketing, which I highly encourage you to download and read — if you haven’t already.

While John touches on many aspects of the trends affecting Internet marketing (such as advertising, content, authority sites, and more), for me the most salient point is, without question, the decline in long-copy salesletters, and the increasing popularity and versatility of video-based salesletters.

However, there are a few things to note.


Business management expert Peter Drucker once said: "The truly important events are not the trends. They are changes in the trends."

In other words, it’s not how trends affect sales copy that’s important. It’s what they tell us about how people digest it (and how they want to digest it) that is.

In "The Next Information Revolution" (Forbes, August 24, 1998), he stated that we are moving beyond the mere "collection, analysis, and presentation of data," to understanding the meaning and purpose of the data.

In fact, Drucker said that trends most often are just fads. In my estimation, important trends — those that affect how we understand and serve markets better — are the ones worth spotting.

Why? Because trends teach more about our market and their behavior, than they do about market demand or opportunities.

In other words, what’s important is what we can learn from these trends, how they affect the way we serve markets, and how we can use them to serve (and sell) more effectively.

Again, it’s all about human behavior and salesmanship, which will never change. People shape technology and allow it to flourish — and not the other way around.

New technologies will come and go. Some will flourish and expand. Others will eventually fall by the wayside or outright fail.

But any new technology — like video on the web, for instance — is not the result of a new trend. It basically allows trends to take form. It allows users to receive, collect, and act upon the data in the way that best suits them.

Technology is a facilitator, not an instigator. It allows users to affect the way businesses serve and persuade them, rather than let businesses dictate how users should respond to, and buy from, them.

That said, I want to make something clear: copy will never change. That is, good, compelling, personal, ego-driven copy (the user’s ego, not the author’s) will never change. And long copy will never die, either.

But the spammy, garish-looking, gaudy, long-scrolling salesletter is on its last legs. It will always be around, I believe. But people will invariably see through them, if they don’t already. And they will do so particularly because of the contrast created by other forms of content delivery and the value they create.

Let me be more specific.

These long salesletters will always work. And in some markets, they will work better than others and are more appropriate.

But to me, such salesletters are akin to "smash-and-grab" jewelry thieves. They come into the market with their long, hypey, over-the-top copy, make as many sales as they possibly can, and then stagnate or die — forcing the marketer to come up with a new product to sell to keep cashflow at a sustainable level.

Long, hypey salesletters are like drugs. They give the marketer a temporary high with an injection of new sales. But after a while, they come down from the “trip,” which forces the marketer to change, tweak, test new copy, or create more of the same “one-shot products” to stay afloat.

For a growing number of people, this is no different than the snake-oil salesmen of days gone by who drove into a new village, sold as many of their concoctions as possible, and then skipped town before people realized their "amazing cures" were worthless.

Does this mean that direct marketers are snake oil salespeople? Not at all. Loud, long-scrolling copy has sold many a great product — and will continue to do so. They will always have a place.

But for long-term, steady, sustainable success and growth, these devices will falter more and more over time — or be perceived as snake oil salesmen by an increasing majority of people. The copy will therefore need to work harder at communicating proof, credibility, and trustworthiness.

This need was always existent. But it’s moreso today, especially on the Internet. Why? Because the Internet is indeed different. And this is the point I was really trying to convey in my own report.

After John Reese released his report, one person defiantly mentioned that "the video-based salesletter is ludicrous," that "nothing beats classic paper and pen," and that "video buffering times are too slow," which will deter the easily distracted.

I agree in part. Particularly the bit about distraction. But my answer to his statement is, you don’t use classic "paper and pen" on TV or radio. And ostensibly, you shouldn’t. The Internet is just another medium, true. But it’s not a direct mail medium.

Granted, it used to be at first (since browsers were once only text-based), and still is to some degree. But that’s changing. Why? Because the Internet is growing up. (Call it “Web 2.0″ or whatever you want. It doesn’t matter.)

In fact, this is the same thing with buffering times: the increasing penetration of broadband and new video technologies (i.e., Flash and better compression) will make video even more flexible and faster-loading over time. In fact, it’s here already.

(If you want to see where video is going, check out this webcast from Adobe. While this video shows upcoming ways of monetizing videos, I’m more intrigued by to the use of videos to monetize copy — and how videos are becoming easier to use and more versatile.)


As for the point about being a distraction, it’s exactly for this reason I believe that video is more powerful than long-scrolling, "pen-and-paper" copy.

I called this the "ping factor" in my report, The Death of The Salesletter. We are distracted on the Internet, and moreso these days because of the growing popularity of technologies that allow for more interaction, communication, and content delivery.

(Think instant messengers, blogs, RSS feeds, emails, alerts, widgets, applications, push technologies, multi-tabbed browsers, etc.)

For example, if a salient point that might clinch the sale happens to be in the middle of your long video, it can be easily overlooked when people are distracted.

That’s why I believe long infomercials on the web don’t work, just as much as long copy on the web doesn’t work — or work as good as it used to. The web is not another direct mail medium, just as much as it is not another TV or radio medium, either.

Entirely video-based salesletters on the web will be counterproductive. They still need copy and mechanisms that allow those videos to be digested, and above all, small enough to appeal to the easily distracted.

Small, pithy, bite-sized videos, audios, even copy (e.g., shorter paragraphs, copy clusters, and visual aids for eye gravity), that are used to communicate, support, or emphasize key points in the salesletter, are best.

(With respect to videos, smaller sizes also increase loading-time speeds.)

To be clear, John Reese did not claim that salesletters should be entirely video-driven. In fact, his report offers a few examples of how they work best with, or accompanied by, written copy.

In the end, remember that video, audio, and text all use copy. It’s all copy. It’s not the copy that’s changing. And it’s certainly not human behavior. It’s its delivery that’s changing.

Bottom line, saying that classic "paper and pen" on the web is the only way to go is analogous to saying that 8-track tapes is the only way to listen to music.

About the Author

Michel Fortin is a direct response copywriter, author, speaker, consultant, and CEO of The Success Doctor, Inc. Visit his blog and signup free to get tested conversion strategies and response-boosting tips by email, along with blog updates, news, and more! Go now to http://www.michelfortin.com.

Last 5 Posts by Michel Fortin

Share This Post

Share this post with a friend by clicking "share this" below. You may freely reprint or redistribute this article, provided the content and links are left intact, and the "about the author" section is included. Get notified of new posts by RSS or email, below.

RSS Feed email updates Email Updates
Confessions Of A Website Copywriter  

Confessions Of A Website Copywriter

New! Possibly the Internet's best copywriting ebook on how to write proven sales copy for the Internet, from writing and web design, to testing. Highly recommended! Click for more »

Other Related Posts

16 Replies to “Copy Is Not About Selling, It’s About Serving”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. From Internet Marketing Tips From The Web 5/4/2007 Take 2

    [...] Copy Is Not About Selling, It’s About Serving Excellent post by Michel Fortin on the future of copywriting. [...]

    Source Website May 4th, 2007

  2. From CustomersAreAlways

    It Is All About Serving…

    I’ve been an avid reader of Michel Fortin’s blog for quite some time now.  I’ve been keeping up on the latest copywriting news and basically learning how to be a better writer.  Besides, his blog is a great example of……

    Source Website May 6th, 2007

  3. From “What’s The Difference Between Selling And Serving?” « Opt-In List Secrets

    [...] Click here [...]

    Source Website May 24th, 2007

Comments

  1. From Ken Calhoun

    Excellent points on credibility and usage of multimedia to increase perceived credibility, using video segments as well as core copy elements.

    Having used video in my salesletters since 2000, I can attest that it’s critical to success, and I’ve sold nearly $2M using video web-based salesletters.

    I’ve personally tested both long-copy with and without video, and have found that video, produced and written/scripted professionally (no youtube please!) creates six figure sales, when the message-to-market match is properly addressed in the video and the presentation of the site.

    Good points, and dialogue.

    Regards,

    Ken Calhoun
    http://www.copywritinguniversity.com

    Author's Website May 3rd, 2007

  2. From Michel Fortin

    Absolutely, Ken. And thank you. (If you want some examples of using video with copy, check out any of Ken’s sites.)

    Author's Website May 3rd, 2007

  3. From Ken Calhoun

    Thanks Michel…

    And for everyone, a few great resources to look at for ideas, are the livemercial “virtual call center” portfolio, these are short landing pages with excerpts from infomercials:

    http://www.livemercial.com/vcc.php

    as well as the landing pages for jwgreensheet.com-listed top infomercials, like carletonsheets.com , totalgym.com, bowflex.com, buythebullet.com and other top sellers, and also the http://asseenontvnetwork.com ones, too.

    but wait, there’s still more!…

    Also, just watch a bunch of infomercials; after seeing ‘em a few hundred times you’ll start to be able to tell the successful ones (like the guthy-renker .com ones, all very well done), from those that aren’t, for inspiration in copywriting/scriptwriting for ‘net video…

    ken

    Author's Website May 3rd, 2007

  4. From Katie Cummings

    “That’s why I believe long infomercials on the web don’t work, just as much as long copy on the web doesn’t work — or work as good as it used to. The web is not another direct mail medium, just as much as it is not another TV or radio medium, either.”

    I’d have to disagree here. Your cutting out an entire population of methodical personality types. These are the people who want cold hard facts. They want all the details and they are willing to scroll down as far as they have to to get the in formation they need to make a purchase.

    Granted, it seems most web site visitors either know what they want and are there simply for a purchase, but there are plenty of opportunities to sell to other types of visitors when using longer copy.

    Author's Website May 4th, 2007

  5. From Jay Brooks

    Wow, it’s the confirmation I have been looking for. I certainly thought that I was on the right track but this confirms it. Videos really do work. Sky is the limit, if we expand our thoughts on how we can use it. Thanks John, Michel & Ken.

    Dedicated to your success,

    Jay Brooks @ 850.591.0603 M
    http://www.AffiliateMarketingVideoSecrets.com

    Author's Website May 4th, 2007

  6. From Michael A. Stelzner

    Hi Michel;

    Nice hearing you speak last night.

    I took a look at The Rebirth of Internet Marketing and FRANKLY, I was not impressed.

    From what I can tell, this is an example of someone executing a marketing strategy to create buzz.

    Has anyone actually read the report??

    Am I missing something??

    One thing I did notice is that within a very short period of time, the author had LOTS of people post responses.

    The blog itself gives away the marketing hype behind the scene.

    For example, what is the likelihood that over 100 people would respond between the hours of 11pm and 2am?

    I think this is a very clever approach. Clearly the responses were all pre-gathered and posted by a few people in the middle of the night.

    Do you care to defend your old mentor?

    Is this perhaps a bit of deceptive marketing?

    Mike

    Author's Website May 4th, 2007

  7. From Michelle MacPhearson

    Mike - for what it’s worth, I posted my response about 1 hour after receiving the link to the PDF, after having read it. When you’ve got a list as big as John’s, there are all sorts of people up, all over the world (remember, it wasn’t 2am in Australia, Malaysia, etc.) to respond to a mailing at any hour.

    Re the info contained in the report - for a industry that has been driven by long-copy slaesletters as *the* way to go since it’s inception, the advent (and success) of video as a marketing tool is, in fact, big news.

    Sure, John’s launching Income.com - but don’t let your cynicism overshadow your ability to gain some great nuggets of info (or inspire new ideas) from the reports’ contents.

    -Michelle MacPhearson

    Author's Website May 4th, 2007

  8. From Michel Fortin

    Michael,

    Overall, the report, to me, is not incredibly impressive either. But the bit I took from it that was important was highlighted in my blog post, above.

    I can’t defend John without knowing the full strategy. My guess is that, yes, it is in part to create buzz for his upcoming “Income.com” launch. Everything John does has a reason and a purpose. Sometimes, it’s obvious. Other times, it’s not. It’s worth watching, at the very least.

    But as for late night comments, my guess is, John has millions of followers from all over the globe — many of which are top marketers who have huge lists. (Some who have helped out during previous launches from John have lists as large as 50k to 500k people.)

    My guess? Some of these “500-pound gorillas” could have posted/emailed their lists about the report late at night, prodding a bunch of responses at that time.

    (I know, for example, that Ed Dale, from Australia, is another Reese fan — and he, or someone else in Australia, may have alerted their lists in the middle of the night, which is morning or afternoon for them).

    Other than that, I really don’t know.

    Impressive? Maybe not to some people. But to many marketers, it’s a bit of a slap in the face. The content of the document is insightful to many people and caused quite a stir. This is fascinating to me.

    John has always put out tons of content, often in spurts, and many times for no real (i.e., apparent) reason. This may be one of them. But I agree with you that this might be a tool used to create buzz for his upcoming product. Clever? Yes. Whether that’s deceptive or not is arguable.

    I appreciate your feedback because white papers is your shtick. And I love your stuff. It’s great to see it from different perspectives — yours is definitely one of them. For me, I took what I wanted from it (videos and copy), and I guess that would be the same for everyone else.

    But I love to see what others think.

    Author's Website May 4th, 2007

  9. From Lenny

    Watch out when the world moves broadband 3, the technology of which already exists.

    You’ll be able to watch TV on the net (imagine tuning into shows in Australia, Singapore, England from the US). Telecommunications providers will lose massive income because all local and international calls will be free through VoiP.

    So video infusion into website (and even email) marketing is inevitable!

    But all the sales copy points will still be valid - it will just be presented in a different format!

    Author's Website May 4th, 2007

  10. From Richy

    I have to say I wasn’t impressed with the report that much. He stated nothing more than was just plain old common sense and I will tell you why.

    If you have been around on the internet since late 2004 early 2005 you would realize that the google adsense program became a phenomenal way to make good money from your website, there was no doubt about that. Human nature tells us that people cant keep their mouths shut, they need to justify their own self importance and prove to others how good they are. It is more than likely that the majority of people told their friends their family and anyone else at how much money they were making from adsense , boasting and being arrogant to show others how good they were, sad but true.

    Ok, by this time late 2005 people had spread the word about adsense and it had become like a virus, everyone was starting to investigate the possibilities that the internet could be their easy way out and a quick fix to all their financial problems. This is where this new wave of people are coming from everyday. If people would have kept their mouths quiet they wouldn’t have spoilt this remarkable system that enabled you to make very good money.

    Lets not forget the fact also that it was the genius of the greatest internet marketer on this planet Mr Jeff Johnson above anyone else who changed the face of internet marketing and basically allowed people this opportunity to make big money fast due to his announcement of the Blog and Ping strategy to the world and that is an absolute fact. People wrecked and abused this remarkable strategy.

    The other half of the report is basically talking about video on sales pages well hmmmmm hellooooo if you have been living in a cave or something it’s quite easy to see what effects You tube have had on the internet and there were even two top marketers who showed last year what a video can do on your sales page, so this was nothing new.

    I respect John for what he has achieved but. ever since August 2004 he seems to have changed. I didn’t really like what seemed to be arrogance at the start of that report. I hope one day he comes back and we get the old John back , the John before the Traffic Secrets release.

    Richy

    Author's Website May 5th, 2007

  11. From Michel Fortin

    Here’s an interesting post today by Seth Godin…

    sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2007/05/longer_and_shor.htm…

    Author's Website May 7th, 2007

  12. From Franck Silvestre

    Yup, it seems that everytime I learn something about IM, I came too late!

    I am just starting to write my sales letters following the 12 (or 14) points web copy formula, and it’s getting shorter.

    I’ve just put my first sales page in the critique section of your forum Michel.

    My question, where can we learn how to do this with videos?

    Author's Website May 8th, 2007

  13. From Shaun O’Hagan

    Hi Michel,
    My first post on your blogg. I came here to look at another topic but spotted this thread about John Reese’s report. I must admit it had a big effect on me and I went into a bit of a black mood after reading it. I am just a very average chap trying to grow a business online and to have a picture painted of the future that almost resembled the begining of The Terminator with the 1% ruling the 99% of failures was not nice. I guess he was just voicing the fears of every “not yet successful” online entrepreneur as we await the Tsunami of newbies that will inevitably arrive. To become the 1% do we need to become prolific authors with wisdom to deploy to the “less educated”? Does it not mean that the great leveller that is the internet will change back again to be run by those with the knowledge and the skill to articulate and use it? Will my education actually become useful again ? LOL
    Regards
    Shaun.

    Author's Website May 8th, 2007

Confessions Of A Website Copywriter  

Confessions Of A Website Copywriter

New! Possibly the Internet's best copywriting ebook on how to write proven sales copy for the Internet, from writing and web design, to testing. Highly recommended! Click for more »

Leave a Reply




Comments will be sent to the moderation queue.

 

Home | About | Sitemap | Consulting | Members | Main | Forum | Ezine | Services | FAQ | Privacy | Legal | TOP

Michel Fortin, CEO of the copywriting agency, The Success Doctor, Inc.

© 1997-2008 The Success Doctor, Inc. All Rights Reserved
1707 Cara Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario (Canada) K4A1M4
Telephone/24-Hour Fax: (613) 482-4828 | Contact Me

RSS Feed