Start Your Own Business or Grow an Existing One

Hundreds of step-by-step video tutorials and tools show you how to find profitable markets, get product ideas, source the best products to sell, build profitable websites easily, and drive qualified traffic. Plus, discover how to outsource it all.

Everything you need to start or grow your own highly profitable web business — regardless of size or model.

  • 1,000s of ready-to-sell products
  • Ideal for any skill level or business
  • Learn anywhere, anytime, 24/7
  • Use it risk-free for a full 30 days

Want More? Click Here For Details »


Breaking This Copywriting Rule Boosts Profits

Breaking This Copywriting Rule Boosts Profits

iStock 000008145844XSmall 150x150 Breaking This Copywriting Rule Boosts ProfitsThe other day I was asked the fol­low­ing ques­tion: “Should I use active or pas­sive voice in sales copy?” My answer may sur­prise you.

The premise behind this ques­tion is sim­ple. Tra­di­tional rules of good writ­ing state that we should use active voice. When it comes to copy­writ­ing, it makes per­fect sense.

For instance, active voice engages the reader and makes it easy for them to quickly under­stand the copy. They don’t have to sort through a sen­tence to under­stand it.

For those rea­sons, writ­ers are told again and again to focus on using active voice. But I’m telling you that, in some cases, you shouldn’t. And here’s why…

Active voice is best for web con­tent and in the body copy of a mar­ket­ing piece. But pas­sive voice can increase both read­er­ship and response because it front-​​loads impor­tant key­words, espe­cially in head­ings, cap­tions, bul­lets, and lead sentences.

There’s some inter­est­ing eye­track­ing research behind this the­ory, which reveals counter-​​intuitive results based on the first few words of the open­ing sentence.

I think this is par­tic­u­larly applic­a­ble in copy.

With the active voice, the object of the sen­tence typ­i­cally appears at the end. For exam­ple, “John throws the object” is bet­ter than “the object is thrown by John.”

But the idea is that peo­ple never read sales let­ters. They first skim, scan, and scroll.

Eye­track­ing stud­ies show peo­ple only read the first few words. They also show their eyes tend to grav­i­tate toward promi­nent mark­ers. Peo­ple scan for these mark­ers in an effort to make a deci­sion on whether the con­tent is of inter­est to them and worth reading.

(For exam­ple, think of the times you’ve bought a news­pa­per or mag­a­zine, and quickly scanned the head­lines and pho­tos to deter­mine which arti­cles you wanted to read.)

Of course, pho­tos, graph­ics, and mul­ti­me­dia pro­vide eye grav­ity. But in copy, mark­ers include head­lines, lead­ing sen­tences in para­graphs, sub­heads, bul­lets, and captions.

The pas­sive voice allows the object to appear ear­lier dur­ing those cru­cial first words. So when peo­ple scan for these mark­ers, impor­tant key­words appear at the begin­ning and there­fore may be able to stop scan­ners more efficiently.

They may be able to per­suade more effec­tively, too.

From a usabil­ity per­spec­tive, front-​​loaded key­words in header tags increase things like SEO effec­tive­ness and read­abil­ity. They also increase trac­tion as front-​​loaded key­words appear first in search engine results, which in some cases are truncated.

But from a copy­writ­ing stand­point, this idea of pas­sive voice con­struc­tion in your sub­head­ings can also help in many ways. For instance, pas­sive voice can:

  • Stop scan­ners since they have to stop scan­ning to read the full sen­tence in order to under­stand it, and there­fore, even for a moment, they are forced to focus on it.
  • Push read­ers to start read­ing what fol­lows. It’s harder to under­stand a pas­sive sen­tence at a glance, which in many cases can be a good thing. Read­ers now have to really dig into a sen­tence to grasp it, and once they do they’ll con­tinue reading.
  • Com­pel read­ers more effec­tively, as per­sua­sion and psy­cho­log­i­cal tech­niques can be applied to those first few words, such as focus­ing on words that build curios­ity, increase desire, cre­ate men­tal imagery, and drive action.

Here’s an exam­ple of a sub­head using active and then pas­sive voice:

Active: “Aus­tralian sci­en­tists dis­cover three enzymes that beat stom­ach cancer.”

Pas­sive: “Three enzymes that beat stom­ach can­cer are dis­cov­ered by Aus­tralian sci­en­tists.” Or, to make it pithier, which is start­ing to sound like a news­pa­per headline…

Pas­sive: “3 stom­ach cancer-​​curing enzymes dis­cov­ered by Aus­tralian scientists.”

From an SEO stand­point, peo­ple wouldn’t search for the phrase “Aus­tralian researchers,” unless they knew about it before­hand. But they would search for words like “enzymes,” “stom­ach,” “can­cer,” and “cure.”

From a copy­writ­ing stand­point, the key­words are now promi­nent. They lead the reader. And they also tease, cause read­ers to learn more, and force them to read the rest — which is the point of a good head­line in the first place.

By the way, if you didn’t notice, I broke another rule in the above exam­ple. Nor­mally, the rule is to spell single-​​digit num­bers, and to use numer­als with double-​​digit num­bers or greater (such as seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 12, etc).

I use numer­als because the mind doesn’t have to read the num­ber, and it can instantly grasp what it means, which is par­tic­u­larly cru­cial dur­ing those first few seconds.

The bot­tom line is, the less hoops the mind has to go through, the eas­ier it is to read, the more effec­tive the copy is, and the more sales you will make.

Nev­er­the­less, to improve usabil­ity and SEO, apply the pas­sive voice to your web page title tags, meta-​​description tags, header tags (such as H1, H2, H3, etc), anchor texts in links, lead copy, excerpts, ALT tags, even domain names. (For exam­ple, Heather Kirk, who is a graphic designer, owns “Graph​ics​By​Heather​.com.”)

How­ever, apply the pas­sive voice to strate­gic ele­ments in your copy, too:

  1. Head­lines
  2. Sub­heads
  3. Tes­ti­mo­ni­als
  4. John­son boxes
  5. Guar­an­tees
  6. Bul­lets
  7. Cap­tions
  8. Calls to action
  9. Titles (in multimedia)
  10. Email sub­ject lines
  11. Nav­i­ga­tion menus
  12. Above-​​the-​​fold sections
  13. Order forms or response devices
  14. Lead copy (introduction)
  15. Lead sen­tences (first sen­tence of each paragraph)

Look at your cur­rent saleslet­ter or mar­ket­ing piece, and try to reword those promi­nent mark­ers into the pas­sive voice or in a way that places impor­tant key­words at the begin­ning. This tech­nique will boost your sales and profits.

(Or should I say, your sales and prof­its will be boosted by this technique?)

About the Author

Last 5 Posts By Michel Fortin

Other Related Posts


Share
Category: Articles
This post was written on Wednesday, October 7th, 2009. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Confessions Of A Website Copywriter

Confessions Of A Website Copywriter

New! Possibly the Internet's best copywriting ebook on how to write proven sales copy for the Internet, from writing and web design, to testing. Highly recommended! Click for more »

  • Passive voice headlines also seem to work better for social media submissions.

    Now I am trying to work out if "Boost Profits Breaking This Copywriting Rule" is going to be better for a submission
  • Great info, Michel. Thanks!
  • Seems logical but it requires a little more creativity in order to "purposely" construct the sentences in a passive voice. Most of the best copies usually comes intuitively to a person as a person speaks.

    I usually keep to a couple of rules:
    1.) Quick For Readers To Get It
    2.) Easy For Readers To Read

    Like you said using the digit 3 in
    "3 stomach cancer-curing enzymes discovered by Australian scientists"
    is faster for the reader to interpret in his mind than the word "three".

    Then again, Active voice usually makes it easily read and understand (most of the time it's because it's in a conversational tone...conversational tone usually makes the message seems more personal to a reader)

    Anyway, I've long decided that a when it become too analytical and scientific about writing copy, it usually comes out rather sucky...

    I guess I could write intuitively first...followed by analyzing the copy to modify the parts of the copy where applicable to applying a passive voice...
  • Thanks for this post Michel.

    In white papers we find a lot of passive voice as well.

    Sometimes it seems to add a bit of objectivity.

    It is nice to add this to my support for passive voice.

    Mike
  • Galina Vitkova
    Thamk you for the very interesting post, Michel,
    The similar situation with Passive Voice is in technical texts. Very often an object of an Active Voice sentence is much more important than a subject from the information point of view.
    Galina
  • Use it all the time. But just the same, thanks for sharing such a valuable tip.

    Sam
    ps. Btw, I still have that question for you! ;-)
  • Interesting. Since I use seo to promote my sites, this is something I always use (even with my blog).

    It's a controversial subject, and it's good to see how you made this easy.

    But as always, this should be subject to tests, because even if you get a better search engine placement, you still need to hook these people into your copy.

    So I must say that passive voice can boost profits, yes, but the headline shoulb be as strong as the one in the active voice.
  • Very interesting and insightful.

    Although when testing writing letters vs. digits in headlines and ads we have discovered that more often than not writing out the number increase conversion. Even with double digits. I don't have a theory why this is. Perhaps you do?

    For example, the first "headline" would probably beat the second:

    Forty Ways to Improve Your Skills

    40 Ways to Improve Your Skills


    Thanks, Michel.
  • Very good tip, Michel. I'd be hesitant to use passive voice in body copy, but it's definitely effective for headlines, bullet points, and the like. Any thing that is likely to be picked out by someone who is scanning, rather than reading, can probably benefit from using the passive voice instead of the active.
  • Interesting tip. But is passive voice really required? Essentially, you're creating inverted pyramid sentences. You can often eliminate the passive component and still deliver the same punch. For example, you have: "3 stomach cancer-curing enzymes discovered by Australian scientists." Why not just: "3 enzymes cure stomach cancer, Australian scientists find." (Or "...may cure..." if you want don't want to be so bold.) I think you're completely on the right track, but also think you can usually refine further to get rid of the passive. At least I hope so, because I'm not a big fan of the passive voice ;)

    On a different note, Peter, I think using numerals instead of words for numbers works best when you have visual variation. For example, when we write Google AdWords for clients, we find that adding numerals ("9/10 doctors agree; 100% approved, etc.) increases conversions, theoretically because the numbers make our ads stand out from competing ads that have all words. (But it is, admittedly, just a theory.)
  • Michel, I'm feeling a bit contrarian--and as a copywriter, I'm usually striving for an active voice. Rather than the approaches below, couldn't you have your cake and eat it to with

    "3 new enzymes cure stomach cancer: latest Australian research gives new hope to cancer patients."

    Shel Horowitz, copywriter and award-winning author of five marketing books
    Blogging at http://www.principledprofit.com/good-business-b...

    <<>>
  • Ok, because I'm following comments, I've been receiving replies in my inbox and I just have to jump back in here...

    Why do we have to go with formula or against formula... some things just seem natural, right and really attention-grabbing no matter how one breaks them down... for example...

    "Bye Bye Stomach Cancer! These 3 Enzymes Kick Your Ass!"

    Now, someone tell me, which person, suffering from stomach cancer, is not going to open that email or read that post? They can learn about the Aussies in the first paragraph if they're that important.

    Let's try another example!

    Sam
  • Sam, that was brilliant. Great example of thinking outside, and great copywriting.
  • That's a heart breaking post. I always try to write in the active voice.

    Although I guess breaking the active voice rule will only work on first sentences and first lines as it's where people look first.

    So after you grab them with your passive sentence, you then go on with the active voice to keep them reading.

    It's just my opinion though, what do you think Michel?
  • Hi Michel,

    Very good observations!

    It all goes to some of the inherent differences
    between web writing and other kinds, doesn't it?

    Passive, active ... whatever it takes to blend SEO,
    scanning eyeballs and GOOD copy, right?

    Good stuff. Good comments, too!

    Ciao,

    Carolyn
  • The research is really brilliant, thank you Michel.
  • Great post!

    I'm curious whether the Glyphius copywriting software can score which version -- passive or active -- will score better??

    BTW, I really liked Shel's and Sam's versions!

    Best regards,
    Sharon
  • Great tip -- it makes sense from an SEO perspective.

    I also find that the passive voice works well for persuasive writing. For example, nobody really wants to hear that they are doing something wrong (unless -- sometimes -- when they ask). But everyone wants to hear about the injustices being done *to* them.

    Passive voice underlines this, subconciously making the reader feel helpless to the Fates. I think this approach gives more impact to the solution when you switch into an active voice. The reader suddenly feels empowered, thanks to your solution, and more likely to act.

    ~Graham
  • Wow! That throws everything on it's head, yet makes perfect sense. It seems that the point is not--you must use one or the other, but to use whichever one will be the strongest and serve you the best at any given point in the copywriting process. The passive pulls the prospect into the copy at certain points and helps SEO, and the active makes the copy/product come alive and help the prospect see themselves using the product. Both are important, but the skill is in knowing which to use when.
  • Boy, we know we're in the attention age we can't even rely on people to finish reading a sentence.

    I see what you're saying. Agree mostly. Keywords aren't just for search engines. Key nouns that resonate with the target market really get attention -- so I've seen.

    Still, I'm wondering if we can have the best of both worlds. I often do. With your example...

    "Australian scientists discover three enzymes that beat stomach cancer."

    I really think "stomach cancer" and not "three enzymes" is the stronger keyword. How about:

    "Beat Stomach Cancer With Just Three Enzymes: Australian Scientists Reveal New Hope for Sufferers."
  • Michel,

    Gee, now I've been here twice in two days. But you "roped me in" with this subject as it is very interesting to me. So, in I dive...

    Active versus passive voice huh?

    Active - the cow jumped over the moon.

    Passive - the moon was jumped over by the cow.

    I see what you are saying here Michel. It depends on what you are trying to highlight. The cow? Or the moon?

    If it is the moon then I guess you have a case but I still DON'T LIKE IT!

    Are we writing for PEOPLE or ROBOTS now? In my opinion, too many people are bastardising the language to write for 'bots and spiders. What they need to understand is that good prose will be followed. Bot-talk, as I call it, is stilted and reads boringly.

    Trying to "outsmart" search-engines is creating an armada of silly writers.

    But I do GET what you are saying and if you are a GOOD writer, as you so obviously are, then you can get away with it. But if you are a novice then, unfortunately, you will come across as only semi-literate.

    My advice - for what it is WORTH - is be conversational, be yourself and write as you would talk. People like that.

    Regards

    Gary Simpson
  • @Gary Simpson - You said, "Are we writing for PEOPLE or ROBOTS now?" And that's precisely the point. We're writing for people. People don't read. They skim.

    Also, you said, "My advice - for what it is WORTH - is be conversational, be yourself and write as you would talk. People like that."

    Excellent point. Because many of us talk using the passive voice.

    @John C. A. Manley - Excellent! Again, it's not so much the passive voice that's important. As I said at the closing of my article, try to reword those prominent markers in a way that places important keywords at the beginning. Passive voice is just one way. And it's often the easiest way. But it's not the only way.
  • In thinking about active voice vs passive voice it's helpful to keep in mind where the reader is coming from. In articles and web content, SEO is critical. That's when you definitely to get the keywords frontloaded - and often get the passivel constructions yo suggested.

    Sales pages are generally different. I wouldn't rely on fickle SEO to get people to a sales page. For the most part, they're coming from ppc, or email or a pre-sell page, etc. In the sales page, how you engage the reader is paramount. So i would think solely about the reader not the search engines on sales pages.
  • Hi Michel,

    Thanks for the quick reply.

    I have NEVER said things like: "The moon was jumped over by the cow." That just sounds really dumb and unnatural - which is the way some people are 'bot-writing.

    Although your points are well founded I fear too many people are out-smarting themselves trying to fool search engines. That was my point.

    Regards

    Gary Simpson.
  • @Gary Simpson - I understand, Gary. But again, I didn't say you should always use it. I said you should use it with "markers" in copy, such as headers, headlines, bullet points, leads, captions, etc. Things that draw the eyes.
  • Michel,

    Then we are in accord. My point was the tom-foolery that some people use to try to lure the search engines. Some are writing nonsense just to get those bots and spiders crawling.

    Thanks for the exchange.

    You and Sylvie have a great Christmas in the cold as we swelter over here - lol.

    Gary from Oz.
  • @Gary Simpson - Agreed 100%.
  • Great post Michel, your post are always on point...
  • Shanika Journey
    I understand this article completely. However, I seriously thought more people were using this technique. I was taught early to use the passive sentences as lead in paragraphs, sub-headings and major headlines. I didn't realize that many people use the active voice has a lead in copy.

    I guess that's why this article has me scratching my head a bit. I knew people were reading further into my paragraphs and topics once I've used those types of sentences. Wow...

    Some rules are made to be broken -- if used carefully.
  • This makes perfect sense. Your examples of the Australian researchers is exactly the way one writes a great news release lead.
  • @David Leonhardt - Thanks, but I think @John C. A. Manley has a much better way of saying it. By the way, both John and I are Canadians. It's nice to see a few more Canucks on this blog. ;)
  • Hi Michel,

    Thanks for the quick reply.

    I have NEVER said things like: “The moon was jumped over by the cow.” That just sounds really dumb and unnatural - which is the way some people are ‘bot-writing.
    Thank you for this informative forum
  • Odd though that we normally do not talk that way [except for royalty ] but we alternate our writing that way; at least I try.
  • Joined Disqus ,that I have,that I might comment in many venues at the same time.
    That is not exactly passive writing but more Star Wars-like ,but similar and more pronounced.
    On many blogs have I posted as well as forums ,and since I have a blog,web site and forum also,
    I will make more use of passive and active voices when appropriate.
    Forcing passive voice is less natural than when I write normally, but looking at past writings my usage has been sparse in short entries but more prevalent in very long [ 1500 words ] essays.
    That you pointed out the proper usage and timeing of each type of voice leads me to reiterate someone else's coomment on why you have become an excellent copywriter
  • Hello Mic.. thank you for your information.. I think I can used your article to explain to my clients. thank you very much!
  • Hey Michel,

    You never stop delivering!!!

    I work with a lot of English teacher's, for some reason I seem to attract them, and they are always nagging me about leaning towards using the passive voice in my writing.

    Thank you for clarifying this for me and my business.

    I'm only 21, I know when I'm your age and retired I will look back and have you to thank for my success.

    Keep it Coming.

    -Ryan
  • Interesting... I'll buy it. Kind of like German word order, which has eeeverything first, including the object, and finally the verb. The ultimate cliffhanger language.

    Actually more and more important in microblogging and the like... where practically no-one even tries..

    Ahh.... syntax. The tax for your sins. ;)
  • david
    Note that this passive/active rule should also be broken sometimes in newspaper headlines, for example:

    not: Gunman shoots President of Zimbagola

    but: President of Zimbagola shot by gunman
  • Hey Michel
    this makes a lot of sense... I've used passive headlines before and got good results, I'm definitely going to be using this tip for my next sales letter
  • Interesting. Since I use seo to promote my sites, this is something I always use (even with my blog).

    It's a controversial subject, and it's good to see how you made this easy.

    But as always, this should be subject to tests, because even if you get a better search engine placement, you still need to hook these people into your copy.

    So I must say that passive voice can boost profits, yes, but the headline shoulb be as strong as the one in the active voice.
  • What are your results with this tactic? Do you have any proof that this might work? interesting stuff and nice approach but does it work?
  • Make it easy to read. Your message should be that an important point. Not recommended to add a few points in your message
blog comments powered by Disqus
Copywriting Crash Course

The Copywriting Crash Course

New! How to use the secret behind the single most successful piece of copy in the history of the world to write ads that make you wealthy. Click for more »