Slapping Salesletters Together Slaps Back

slappingMy 50-page report last week created quite a stir. Some people who did not read it may have misunderstood my point. However, I’m not going to make another blog post dedicated to the growing popularity of online audio or video. (I probably will, but I’ll save it for another time.)

But to summarize, while salesletters in principle are not dying — I’ve chosen “Death of the Salesletter” as a title to get people to read the report, among other things — and long copy is here to stay, the delivery mechanism is indeed slowly being replaced. (Granted, we still have a way to go, yet.)

By the same token, a certain type of salesletter is indeed dying.

The garish, poorly written, multicolored, suspicious, confusing, long-winded salesletter is definitely on its way out if it isn’t already. And many of these letters have a lot of copy not because they need more copy to make the sale but because they are purposefully long for a variety of reasons.

(Less-than-skilled copywriters will have a tendency to add more copy with the thought, or in the hope, that more copy is what’s needed. That is often not the case. It’s more often due to bad copy, pure and simple.)

The problem is not being long to cover all the bases and give the reader as much information as is needed to make the sale. The problem is, copywriters are lazy and often “pad their copy” with useless content — useless in that it’s irrelevant to the sale, and not necessarily to the reader or the offer.

(Mea culpa. I’m definitely guilty of this, too.)

Yes, copywriters are lazy. Just because you talk a lot let alone write a lot doesn’t mean you can sell. “Ugly websites are dying,” as John Reese once noted. So too are lazy copywriters. (My friend and copywriter Craig Perrine calls them “junior mint copywriters.”)

Contrary to popular opinion, the hardest part is not in the writing but in the editing. Here’s the thing: it’s harder figuring out what NOT to say than it is what to say. And that, my friends, requires skill.

If you were a salesperson in front of a prospect, and if you had all the time in the world, naturally you would say as much as you can. (Keep in mind, there is also a problem with “overselling.”)

Long copy is important because you would sell far more effectively if you had an hour to sell than if you only had 10 minutes. But similarly, you don’t need an entire day, either.

And now with the “ping factor,” which I talked about in my report, your readers’ environment on the web is plagued with more distractions and choices than ever before. So you need to be good not only at getting their attention but at keeping it, too.

I remember when I took public speaking coaching, and my mentor said that you should always charge your heaviest fees for the smallest speeches. For example, you would charge more for a one-hour keynote than you would, say, a two- or three-hour presentation.

At first, this baffled me. You’d think, the shorter the presentation, the lesser the fee. Right?

But then I realized that writing a shorter speech is definitely far more difficult because you still have to convey the same message in less words, and ultimately get people to take action with less words, too.

Copywriting essentially has two major functions: knowing what to say and knowing how to say it. The former requires a lot of research and digging. The latter is a lot easier. That’s why I always prefer rewriting or critiquing copy.

But given the changes we’re experiencing, knowing how to say it is going to become significantly more difficult over time. And thus, it will require a lot more skill to do, too.

Just as choosing what not to say is a skill in itself, you also have to skillfully choose the right words to do the job.

Salesletters that have the highest conversion rates aren’t those that are longer. Or to be more specific, they are not converting because they are long. They are converting because they are pithy — even if they are, by all appearances (and for some people), long.

When I said salesletters are getting shorter, I didn’t mean “short.” I didn’t mean a two- or three-paragraph salesletter as opposed to a two- or three-paged one.

I meant shorter than most long-scrolling, long-winded salesletters that never get to the point, and are therefore too confusing or labor-intense to read because they are clumsy, poorly written, and slapped together without any care or concern.

Brevity has a lot of power.

Jim Rohn said it best:

For effective communication, use brevity. Jesus said, ‘Follow me.’ Now that’s brief! He could be brief because of all that he was that he didn’t have to say.”

In the same sense, what I want you to realize is that your salesletter can sell for you as much as the words do.

(Aside from targeting your audience and creating a powerful offer, this also includes your appearance, the quality of your content, the method of your message’s delivery, and above all, your credibility, i.e., the proof you bring to the table.)

Additionally, by brief I don’t mean to be abruptly short or terse. My friend and top copywriter David Garfinkel wrote an effective article on the subject of the differences between being concise and being curt.

My friend and top copywriter Peter Stone said it best: “Write fearlessly, edit ruthlessly.”

In the final analysis, I believe 2007 is going to be the year where we will see more and more marketers writing far more effective copy. They will tell better stories, edit their copy far more effectively, project a higher quality and believable sales presentation, and embrace the power of engagement and “samplification” on the Internet.

Thence the point: copywriters should think about marketing, salesmanship and understanding human behavior, not just writing. Copywriting is going to be increasingly important. Consequently, copywriters who are skilled and versatile are going to be even more in demand than ever before, too.

If anything, this should be a wakeup call to get off our anatomies and get better at copywriting. The power of copy lies not in the power of using words but in the power of choosing words. And it all boils down to understanding human behavior.

Opportunity is pouding at the door. Are you listening?

Last 5 Posts by Michel Fortin

About the Author


Share
This post was written on Wednesday, January 10th, 2007. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Turn Words Into Cash

Turn Words Into Cash

New! Million-dollar influence and persuasion tactics so potent, if they were any more powerful the government would be forced to classify them as 'mind control'! Click for more »

  • In jest, and as an afterthought, here's a long-scrolling webpage, touted as the "longest" in history (believe it or not, it's 12 miles long. No kidding!).

    http://worlds-highest-website.com/
  • Dave Miz
    Gee.... wait, the design actually has something to do with sales and conversion?

    Now who would have thought. :)
  • I couldn't agree with you more Michel.

    Intimately understanding the prospects and clients you're trying to sell to is the biggest key.

    There's a rash of copywriters convinced that things like red headlines and gurantee certificate graphics are the key to selling online.

    When you spend your time getting to really know your prospects your chances of marketing to them successfully skyrockets.

    The sales letter is incidental.

    It's not always the most effective or efficient way to sell anything.

    If you're a marketer and a salesperson first you won't get stuck thinking this way and you won't miss the HUGE profit making opportunities that are everywhere if you just open your eyes.

    Kindest regards,
    Andrew Cavanagh
  • Michel,

    Interesting thoughts.

    I wrote a 5042 word essay last week and I printed the damn thing out 11 times to edit it. Fleshing a piece out is easy. Knowing what to excise is the difficult part. At least that's how it is for me.

    Maybe an alternative headline to your "Death of the Salesletter" could have been "The Attempted Rape and Murder of the Salesletter."

    OK. Maybe that was a bit over the top. It might offend some people. If it has, I apologize in advance. Please don't castigate me for it folks. I was only trying to offer an alternative that would fit the body of work. (Maybe body wasn't a good word - LOL)

    Gary Simpson
  • >>>http://worlds-highest-website.com/

    Man.. that gave me vertigo just to scroll a bit. 12 miles!

    Another thing to consider is effective blogging as a part of the storytelling process. I know it's not direct response, but relationship selling is the answer to a low trust marketing world.

    Blogging is a way to go "on and on" and tell the story many different ways for different people on the way to the sale. But instead of annoying readers, you're turning them into fans while you make your case.
  • Precisely.

    As I said in my report, the web is different. This is not a call to apply more video and audio, or getting all ajaxy and stuff.

    To some extent, it's relatively simple to do. Blogs is just another method of delivery to samplify your sales messages and engage your readers more.

    I have seen some awesome examples of marketers using Web 2.0 -- as well as different methods of delivery -- quite effectively.

    Here's a cool example of a Web 2.0 site I came across yesterday. In fact, we're seeing some websites like Sears starting to apply virtual reality marketing to their sales, what Steve Rubel dubbed "v-tailing."

    For example, you can upload pictures of your home and "drag and drop" appliances, furniture, flooring styles and paint colors on the walls, so you can visually appreciate of what your new home will look like.

    (But that's going to still be a way off I think. Perhaps in 2008 or 2010? Maybe, I don't know. But now that Second Life has gone open source, we're probably going to see a lot more of it down the road.)

    For now, copywriting is key -- and more so than ever before. Remember, it's all copy.
  • Hi Michel,

    Interesting doc. I must admit "Death of the Salesletter" did get me to read it however I would have read it if the title was about more info on Web 2.0.

    That being said I would like to know how the www.dna11.com site is a Web 2.0 site.

    Maybe I am missing something re web 2.0 atm.

    Cheers
    Justin Bryce
  • Michel,

    Brilliant, simply brilliant!

    Just what I needed to read as we start the new year and look to make 2007 even more profitable for my clients.

    I love the notion of letting prospects interactively choose how they want to be sold. I'll be implementing some of these ideas shortly and I'll let you know how things turn out.

    Just before the end of 2006, I heavily invested in video equipment and software so I could add more of a multi-media experience to websites. I know it's not really revolutionary (yeah, I'm a bit behind the curve) but I've been studying how smart marketers have been using video to boost conversions.

    I never really thought of audio or video as "interactive" though. But after reading your report, I'm singing a different tune.

    In the end, I agree that our job as copywriters is to understand and leverage human behavior. As the web changes so quickly, it's a valuable lesson for copywriters and marketers alike to utilize available technology to give our prospects what they want and create a first-class BUYING EXPERIENCE.

    The free-ride is over for those that don't heed your advice.

    Cheers,

    Mike
  • I would love it if you were to add a print link to your blog, if that is possible. Many times I want to print articles in your blog, for reading later in the day. It's possible to print the article now....only you get all of the other ads with it.
    Larry
  • Hi Michel.

    I like the point about succinct writing. "Charge more for a one hour speech than three, coz the secret lies in the editing."

    Re Video:

    I worry about the pressure on folks to put video on their websites. Video itself is not the point . By this I mean that I have written and produced TV commercials for years. Art direction is fun and choosing gorgeous models makes life even tougher. Camera work and lighting can be very clever too, but in the end the sound track always remains about 95% of the effectiveness.

    Same old same old - it is the copy that counts

    Please keep writing away here. I will keep reading and maybe one day mine will take a turn for the better.

    All the best
    Jonathan
  • Hi Michel,

    As someone who has written a few pieces that were perhaps, uh, too long, let me just say that it's high time someone hit this issue head on so that those of us that really value our time can get down to seriously paying attention to what truly matters in life when nothing around you seems to be as cogent or insightful as it should be and people just go on and on about things that seem to have no correlation or connection and it riles me to no end that some folks seem to have no sense of proportion or respect the boundries of common decency and in fact totally disregard commonly accepted best practices among top copywriters who by golly actually work for a living by studiously and furiosly pounding away at a keyboard like a monkey hopped up on four gallons of Starbucks finest so it is no surprise to me that you chose this time at the beginning of the new year to expose a shift in the industry so profound that it leaves me speechless.

    Right?

    Craig
  • Hey Michel,

    Forgive my last post. Had to get that off my chest.

    With that said, you nailed the core truth of our times in your report: we are so overrun with information that we simply don't have time for copy that doesn't rivet us to each word.

    Salescopy that pierces the fog and jumps out at the prospect and speaks directly to the heart of his or her concerns will convert whether in text, audio or video.

    We all still have problems that we'll pay to solve, we just don't have time to wade through piles of predictable prose offering things we don't actually need using words we've already heard from the last huckster who dazzled us with BS.

    Confused with too much info and too many choices, the marketplace is flocking to known brands. The real killer for many salesletters is not the amount of words or their arrangement, or even the content, how familiar the reader is with the person or company behind the copy.

    Case in point: if you offered me a link to buy a product I'd buy it if you simply said, "Craig, you need this. I love it. Go grab a copy now."

    But if a spammer said the same thing, I'd just click delete.

    In between those two extremes is where everyone else battles it out for my wallet share.

    Who you are is more important than what you say.

    The priority may be more than ever to give value first and then make the sale once trust is earned to sell a first time visitor.

    And the benefit is that you can use much shorter copy to sell something free as there is no risk to the customer.

    Craig
  • Justin, that site was nominated in the Web 2.0 awards, and I pulled it from there. My thinking (and your guess is as good as mine) is that the front page uses Flash navigation.

    Other than the typical "Web 2.0-ish" tell-tale design elements, like black backgrounds, dual-colored headlines and gradients throughout, the "Web 2.0" aspect, for me, is, more than anything, that Flash navigation... Not a wholly Flash site, which would be too "flashy" and far-fetched, in my estimation. But it does add better navigation and creates a better sense of samplification, which I talked about in my report.
  • I read your 50-page report while on the airplane and as a Web 2.0 designer and marketer could not agree more. I was hoping someone would speak sense amid the hype and declining sales methods. I'm also planning on writing how copywriting has lent a helping hand to Web 2.0 by helping it grow up. Just look how the typical font size has increased on pages and the wide use of center-based layout designs...or how about hard hitting bullets that are short and sweet.

    Regarding video, I just read this morning's headline: "Video Emerges As Key to Cisco's Growth"

    Thanks Fortin!!
  • Also wanted to mention how CSS has also helped Web 2.0 move forward and, to some degree, as acted as a father when it comes to the design element. If you've ever worked with tables in website, you know how much a pain they can be by changing your design results or not allowing elements to position were you want them. CSS changes all that ( not just text-based CSS where you changed color and size) with presentational CSS (layout of the site design itself) a designer can achieve accurate design results as if he or she were in a design program.

    For the BEST example of the best CSS based sites a.k.a Web 2.0 check out http://www.cssremix.com

    Great for inspiration...
  • You can read my original post that inspired this report, "The Death of the Sales Letter?" from November 2006. I'm glad the idea is catching people's attention.
  • I totally agree with you. I think your report was right on the mark!
    Even though research shows that those long sales copies outperform the shorter ones, I have never been a fan of those long sales copies anyway. I always go straight to the buy button if I like the product.
    You have the first few paragraphs to convince me else...
    Checkout Brian Clarks post titled http://www.copyblogger.com/the-greatest-sales-l...
blog comments powered by Disqus
Start Making $10K+ Per Copywriting Project!

Start Making $10K+ Per Copywriting Project!

New! Brian McElroy's video lessons show you how to find highly qualified prospects for your services, sell them for instant cash and easily get top dollar. Perfect for copywriters! Click for more »